Example collocations logo

Trade in sentence

11085 examples of Trade in a sentence

On other issues, such as trade, there are distinctions between the candidates.
McCain is a stronger advocate of free trade than Obama is.
Congress plays a large role in trade policy, and the near certainty that the Democratic Party’s majority in Congress will grow after the election means that protectionism will grow as well.
Difficult economic times will make it hard to generate support for trade pacts, despite the current importance of export-oriented firms for the American economy.
The major economies should ensure that such derivatives are restricted as far as possible to qualified and knowledgeable investors who trade on the basis of expectations regarding market fundamentals, rather than mainly or only for short-term speculative gain.
Global skepticism about free trade on the part of US President Donald Trump and others means that we are missing out on an incredibly important opportunity.
Kazakhstan achieved independence at a time when international cooperation, free trade, and collective security were encouraged, and it has long worked to support these principles.
Abolition of the slave trade, or the triumph of socialism, or the spread of human rights and democracy can all be deemed a national interest.
In saving the euro, it is vital not to neglect the EU’s 27 (soon to be 28) countries in areas like trade, energy, and services.
Moreover, this argument neglects the basic point that the rest of the world is linked to Europe through the EU’s 46 trade agreements, with the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership now being negotiated with the United States.
If the UK left the EU, it would have to negotiate new trade agreements independently.
The emerging geopolitical centrality of the Indian Ocean, through which an ever-increasing share of world trade passes, is a third, complicating, factor.
With their burgeoning bilateral trade and shared commitment to eradicating poverty, both India and China have common cause to cooperate in creating a mutually acceptable geopolitical map of South Asia and the Indian Ocean.
Would states have reintroduced trade barriers, ending the single market?
Instead, intra-eurozone trade and investment have increased only modestly, and growth potential has actually weakened.
If the trade deficit is reduced by 3% of GDP between now and the end of the decade, the implied rise in exports and decline in imports would reduce output available for US consumption and investment by about 0.3% per year.
Donald Trump’s Trade-Knowledge DeficitPARIS – As a longtime champion of liberty and free trade, it is not surprising that the United States enjoys one of the highest standards of living in the world.
Trump, for his part, has called for an audit of his country’s current account, in order to understand better the roots of its trade deficit.
To Trump’s mind, the trade deficit reflects difficulties for American enterprises, and implies that Americans are buying foreign instead of US goods.
So, what can economic theory tell us about the US’s trade balance?
If this man were a country, he would be running a trade deficit.
In the case of an entire country, the trade deficit and the corresponding capital-account surplus is simply a consequence of the decisions made by the country’s residents.
They do so knowing that the resulting trade deficit will allow them to make more investments, and achieve a higher rate of growth, than they ever could in a closed economy.
And yet today’s conventional trade wisdom flips this common sense on its head.
The Keynesian view assumes that one should want to maximize total demand by maintaining a trade surplus.
Moreover, it is fanciful to think that a trade deficit – which is merely a reflection of saving and investment activity both inside and outside the country – can be suppressed with protectionist policies.
Protectionism merely reduces international trade overall, by making it harder for importers to buy what they need from exporters; it doesn’t change the balance of imports and exports.
In fact, the benefits of free trade are so large that a country should actually liberalize its international trade even if other countries aren’t doing the same.
This is yet another reason for the US not to regret its trade deficit.
Policies aimed at “solving” trade deficits will always fail.
BackNext