Example collocations logo

Trade in sentence

11085 examples of Trade in a sentence

Bilateral annual trade turnover exceeds $3 billion, with oil constituting more than 96% of Indian imports from Nigeria.
While globalization, and the trade openness that underpins it, has the potential to enrich the entire global economy, so far the richest have captured a hugely disproportionate share of the gains.
Opening up trade in agriculture significantly improved living standards for ordinary Japanese, but it could easily have hurt the country’s farmers.
Fortunately, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government recognized this risk, and took steps to protect local farmers, including in negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement (which Trump has now rejected).
This criminal insurgency is fueled not by popular support, but by the spoils of the cocaine trade.
On the principle that you become what you hate, these paramilitary groups have also captured a slice of the lucrative drug trade.
That process will bring – is already starting to bring – substantial benefits to the region in terms of trade access, political dialogue, and regional co-operation.
Indeed, we recently agreed radical proposals to expand trade access – through asymmetric trade measures – to the EU market for the countries of the region.
Occasionally, NAM provides a useful counterweight to Western pressure – say, regarding Iran, with which India remains eager to build trade and energy relationships.
The apparent demise of the Trans-Pacific Partnership has created unease in Asia and South America about US predictability and about whether the US will remain a champion of global trade or embrace something closer to protectionism.
Mexico, singled out for criticism by Trump during the campaign, faces a unique set of issues concerning both trade and immigration.
Similarly, they can begin to think about how to protect and promote global trade in the absence of new US-led accords.
Some blame an unfair world trading system, in which wealthy nations knock down all trade barriers except their own.
Based on our own experiences--in Mexico, which has opened up to foreign investment and trade, and in Canada, which is a leading aid donor and a major source of private investment in developing countries--we are convinced that many of these problems can be identified, isolated and fixed.
Market liberalization and trade expansion lifted millions out of poverty in the 1990's, particularly in China and India.
In most cases, these countries embraced macroeconomic reform, liberalizing trade and investment rules and improving fiscal management.
Part of the reason for this may be that economic reform must now move from the macro level to the micro level, from trade and monetary policy to the web of legal and financial impediments entangling small business.
There is simply no agreement on how to address glaring problems such as America’s increasingly fragile trade deficit, or financial dysfunction in a number of emerging markets.
As huge winners from globalization, they want to avoid criticism of their trade and financial policies, which arguably remain considerably more protectionist than those of their rich-country counterparts.
First, there is the long-standing litany of policy responses needed to deal with the global trade imbalances.
True, most studies suggest that developing countries ought to precede any sharp opening to international financial markets by liberalizing trade.
They are also a big factor behind the global trade imbalances.
Finally, this time, the negotiations are more manageable in scope, focusing on five specific issues: an agrarian-development policy, the FARC’s political participation, ending the conflict (demobilization and transitional justice), reparations for the victims, and curbing the illicit drug trade.
So the evolving report is usually put up on a Web site and suggestions are invited from one and all--NGOs, trade unions, and other organizations of civil society.
In the view of many Chinese, the US is an exponent of interventionism and imperialism, and the Trump administration’s trade war is merely the opening shot in a larger economic, military, and ideological contest for supremacy.
Behind Trump’s trade war is a desire to rebalance the economic playing field and “decouple” the US from China.
In response to former US President Barack Obama’s efforts to create a Pacific-rim trade bloc to contain China, Xi launched his Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which is now being met by an American-led Indo-Pacific initiative under Trump.
But make no mistake: There is nothing normal or healthy about economic performance that is increasing inequality and, in many countries, leading to a populist backlash – both on the right and the left – against trade, globalization, migration, technological innovation, and market-oriented policies.
But self-reliance will be impossible to achieve as long as the rich countries favor free markets and free trade only when it suits them.
Even in the former Soviet Union, almost all countries are seeking trade and security with anyone but Russia, because Putin is using all sticks and no carrots.
BackNext