Totalitarian
in sentence
204 examples of Totalitarian in a sentence
The threats concentrated in the Middle East are diverse: regional conflicts,
totalitarian
religious ideologies, terrorism, nuclear armament programs, blockades to modernization, unstable regimes and hegemonic ambitions.
But, while the overthrow of
totalitarian
or autocratic regimes shifted the global balance of power in favor of the forces of democracy, not all the pro-democracy movements succeeded.
Totalitarian
regimes – the Nazis, the Soviets in 1980, and now the Chinese – desire to host the Olympics as a way to signal to the world their superiority.
As the Olympic torch relay – itself a creation of the Nazis, first employed in the Berlin Games – makes its way down Speer Jr.’s avenue of power, the world will once again be made to witness a triumph of the
totalitarian
will.
Their overall effort may be useful, because it injects into Central European debates a diversity of ideas that is essential for people who once lived in the sterile atmosphere of a
totalitarian
regime, and where habits of conformity linger.
The
totalitarian
state limited crime, or rather made it less visible.
While many appreciate the new horizons that have opened for them, a lingering ambivalence about their relationship to the paternalistic,
totalitarian
state remains.
A
totalitarian
state will never promote the sort of pluralist, democratic society that, by its nature, limits state power.
Soviet society was like a lake surrounded by high dams of
totalitarian
power.
The gap between
totalitarian
and democratic systems remained too wide; it was impossible to jump over in a single bound.
That choice boils down to an unbearable cynicism or a
totalitarian
utopia.
All
totalitarian
systems have one thing in common: by crushing all forms of political expression except adulation of the regime, they make everything political.
During the twentieth century,
totalitarian
states set records in denationalization: 1.5 million people in the Soviet Union alone were stripped of their citizenship.
When unification began after WWII, democratic Western Europe was faced with the memory of the horrors of two world wars, and with the threat of Communist
totalitarian
rule.
Totalitarian
control was so complete that he had the same interest in productivity of the Soviet Union as a property owner does.
By the time the false religions of
totalitarian
ideologies were defeated, real religions – so it seemed – had long passed from the political scene.
“I don’t think it hurts to remind people who live in
totalitarian
states, subtly perhaps, that they might also do something about their own domestic totalitarianism, instead of just running away from it,” Havel, then Czechoslovakia’s most famous anti-communist dissident, argued in 1986.
“If I demand that Westerners not think merely of their own particular interests and that they behave as we should all behave – that is, as though we were immediately responsible for the fate of the whole of society – then I see no reason why I shouldn’t demand the same of people living in
totalitarian
countries.”
Given North Korea’s past deceptions, and the difficulty of verifying denuclearization in a
totalitarian
country, a verifiable agreement will be difficult to reach.
Since last year it has been enlisting people with historic knowledge and understanding of
totalitarian
regimes to help guide its response to events in Belarus.
Let us remember: Libya is a
totalitarian
tyranny; its leader, Muammar Ghaddafi, combines sometimes erratic behavior with extremist policies, supporting dictators all over the world.
This recalls the American political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski’s observation in the 1950s that
totalitarian
regimes (in contrast to authoritarian ones) impose both prohibitions and imperatives on citizens.
Ellendea Proffer Teasley echoes this view in her bestselling Russian-language memoir Brodsky Among Us, remarking that
totalitarian
systems require not only obedience, but also participation.
To be sure, Russian citizens do retain the freedom to leave the country, meaning that Putin has not built a fully
totalitarian
state – at least not yet.
The political theorist Hannah Arendt wrote that, under
totalitarian
regimes, the state is the only force that shapes the condition of society.
This is quite typical for the economy of a totalitarian, militarised, and isolationist state.
It cracked the yoke of conservatism and
totalitarian
thought, enabling the desire for personal and collective autonomy and freedom to express itself.
Similarly, accepting the right of non-violent Islamists to participate in public life does not mean giving up on the political and ideological struggle to defeat ultra-conservative, and in some cases totalitarian, conceptions of society.
The reaction of the Chinese authorities to the Tibetan protests evokes echoes of the
totalitarian
practices that many of us remember from the days before communism in Central and Eastern Europe collapsed in 1989: harsh censorship of the domestic media, blackouts of reporting by foreign media from China, refusal of visas to foreign journalists, and blaming the unrest on the “Dalai Lama’s conspiratorial clique” and other unspecified dark forces supposedly manipulated from abroad.
Indeed, with words like these, Kolakowski, with Solzhenitsyn, Sakharov, and other kindred souls, ultimately did as much as the trillions of dollars spent on weapons to speed the demise of the
totalitarian
Soviet empire.
Back
Related words
Regimes
State
Their
World
Regime
People
Power
Which
Political
Ideologies
Would
Society
Freedom
Communism
Authoritarian
While
Soviet
Government
Countries
Century