Third
in sentence
4764 examples of Third in a sentence
'Illuminata' has expanded the limits of John Turturro's mediocrity from second rate actor to
third
rate director, writer and producer.
The film was written By Humphries & his
third
wife, Diane Millstead, and directed by the Mad Max man himself, George Miller.
I actually enjoyed it for the first to
third
season.
The
third
one was when they made Jr even more idiotic than before which was beginning to be tedious and vexing to the point where I wanted to go into the T.V. and beat the stupidity out of him until he's unconscious .
Now don't get me wrong, I absolutely love the first Beastmaster; I even liked the
third
one pretty good, but this movie is atrocious.
There was a time when the Alien series was a success with even the
third
installment, Alien 3, showing promise under the guild of a fresh and young David Fincher.
Allegedly, this was to have been the
third
Conan film, but for one reason or another the emphasis was shifted onto the leading female character, the titular red-head, leaving poor old Arnold to play an incredibly dull supporting role.
'A New Generation' is the
third
Amityville entry to base its plot around writer John G. Jones's premise of an item taken from the Long Island house that causes spectral misery and death for its new owners.
In the end, no real front story ever develops and the characters themselves are artificially propped up by monologues from
third
parties.
That's the mistake I made, rent the first one or the
third
one or better yet DON'T STOOP TO THAT LEVEL AT ALL!
This is the
third
movie in a month I have watched that did not go the way I expected.
This concept that you have to simply deal with a slow first
third
of a movie and be rewarded later is nonsense.
Where the movie really loses credibility is in the final
third
of the film where the suspect script, weak performances, and lackluster direction all head further South.
This
third
installment in the Scarecrow series is by far the best of the lot.
I didn't get to see the end of it, which I have to assume was so dripping with syrupy "what have we all learned from this?" nonsense it would bring on an urge to brush the teeth, but everything in the first two-thirds was so memorably bad, even if the last
third
turned out to be a pale imitation of the rest, it's still worthwhile for anyone who gets a kick out of campy, stupid, brainless sci-fi B-flicks.
The plot is as weak, half-baked and annoying as all the music involved (the utterly boring club song seems to continue on, literally, for the first
third
of the movie).
How about the
third
assistant makeup person??? Nope, the fault is with us for perpetuating this kind of crap (in the guise of comedy), that hollywood will continue to feed us until we have the decency to say enough is enough...racism is for real and it isn't a laughing matter.
It t does not really focus so much on Operation Smile or similar organizations like The Smile Train and their Herculean efforts to relieve the suffering of children born with facial deformities in
third
world countries.
The
third
truly is the hero of the story, electing to continue the fight that was brought to our shores nearly eight years ago.
If your intention is to aim for second or
third
(or fourth) best, why even try?
Well, after the
third
time I said no to them until I had proof who they were.
The first third, with its background information on Ladd's Gatsby shown with a series of interesting flashbacks, is the best part of the movie.
Perhaps a serious first draft (with scenes such as Ameche walking out into traffic with two toddlers) was incorporated into a sillier second or
third
version (with Selleck getting poked, bumped, prodded, and eventually losing a toe and a testicle!).
Franco Zeffirelli's ("The Taming Of The Shrew," "Romeo And Juliet," "Jesus Of Nazareth," "Othello")
third
stab at transferring Shakespeare to the screen works very well, with the casting of Mel Gibson ("Mad Max," "Lethal Weapon" and pre-"The Passion Of The Christ" notoriety) in the role formerly owned by Sir Laurence Olivier (and rightly so; see my review on his "Hamlet," arguably the best interpretation of one of the Bard's timeless (and most quoted) tragedies) and redone 5 years later by Kenneth Branagh as a full-bloodied treatment, explaining its 3 hour 22 minute running time, combined with a dream cast (and a lot of little additions, which were well-chosen and expertly done by the contemporary master of William Shakespeare, Kenneth Branagh, the director of "Henry V" and "Dead Again."
All the characters in this film are poor caricatures; none of them have anything even resembling a
third
dimension and they will soon begin to thoroughly bore you.
Since Paul Kersey was running short of actual relatives to avenge, the
third
installment in the "Death Wish" saga revolves on him returning to New York to visit an old war buddy.
Typical Hollywood sequel scenario: if the first film was only shocking, the second wasn't, expect the
third
to be the worst thing to hit the screen this year.
It has to take place after the first movie because Kuzco knows Pacha and Chicha has her
third
child but it can't take place after the second movie because doesn't Kronk get a girlfriend or wife or something?
The
third
episode is a little bit boring,but lovely.
You really don't care what happened to them... Third, the villain is very easy to identify.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Second
There
First
About
Their
Would
After
Countries
Could
Movie
World
Should
Country
While
Other
Fourth
People
Years
Quarter