Teams
in sentence
639 examples of Teams in a sentence
Skype went all-in on Scrum, moving all
teams
to this methodology over a few quarters.
Most
teams
delivered something every 2-4 weeks.
Teams
rotated Scrum Master roles, agile coaches dropped in to give feedback on the teams, and Microsoft – which had just acquired Skype – was interested in taking inspiration from the speedup in delivery.
Teams
being allowed to choose their own way of working was more common at public tech companies and venture-funded scaleups.
Large, non-tech companies and smaller, non-venture-funded companies were more likely to mandate the same approach for all
teams
within the company.
Teams
struggling often had little to do with the methodologies.
For these teams, no change of methodology would help because the issues ran deeper.
While there are
teams
where requirements change a lot, on these
teams
it’s typically the engineers who run the projects, and can deal with them.
Teams
with no autonomy to change a failing project management approach also recorded low satisfaction.
These kinds of responses were pronounced at companies where all
teams
were expected to follow the same methodology.
It’s an example of directive leadership and while this approach can work well for roles where there is little creativity needed, it is usually a poor way to build high-performing software engineering
teams.
When
teams
can iterate together and change their processes on their own terms, satisfaction and productivity go up.
Teams
are free to choose the project management methodology they use.
Many
teams
go with an RFC-like planning process, iterate on building, and ship all within a few weeks.
Other
teams
use more Kanban-like processes, where they work on the highest priority items.
Most of these companies have Technical Program Managers (TPMs) who step in for large projects involving multiple teams, or run across organizations.
Project management artifacts and processes vary between
teams
even in the same organization.
Most
teams
have a project backlog, do standups at intervals as the team sees fit, and retrospectives every now and then.
Many
teams
work on main branches, get quick feedback from CI/CD systems and can immediately share functionality which they are working on with other team members.
This is because the organizational structure of Big Tech greatly impacts how
teams
can – and do – execute.
Autonomy for software engineers and
teams.
Companies that care about engineers solving problems quickly set up various platform teams, which reduce the developer experience churn.
Empowered and autonomous
teams
are the building blocks of all these companies.
While not all
teams
within Big Tech will be fully empowered, these organizations – along with progressive thinking startups – are closest to implementing ways that ensure
teams
are as empowered as possible.
Teams
with clear ownership is another building block of Big Tech.
The mission could be “Build a world-class booking experience for seniors” for a product team on a hospitality product, or “Empower
teams
to integrate rating experiences with close to zero effort” for a product platform team.
Product-focused
teams
are typically composed of cross-functional team members like backend, frontend and/or mobile engineers, with product managers, data scientists and designers often also on the team.
Platform-focused
teams
tend to not be cross-functional or tied to a specific domain.
With empowered and autonomous teams, managing a project is rarely a top down exercise.
When collaborating with other
teams
– also without project managers – they will also build relationships for other engineers leading projects, or owning products.
Next
Related words
Their
Other
There
Would
People
Which
National
Could
Where
Together
Countries
Companies
Working
Players
Across
Years
Sports
Research
Between
About