Example collocations logo

Systems in sentence

4888 examples of Systems in a sentence

Technology can improve things like crop yields or systems for storing and transporting food, but there will be famines so long as there are bad governments.
At the time, these words were earmarked and targeted against the British, but over the last 200 years, they've come to embody what many Westerners believe, that freedom is the most cherished value, and that the best systems of politics and economics have freedom embedded in them.
The fact of the matter is that this has become a very poignant question because there is for the first time in a long time a real challenge to the Western ideological systems of politics and economics, and this is a system that is embodied by China.
They have vastly different political systems and different economic systems, one with private capitalism, another one broadly with state capitalism.
And instead of shoehorning democracy around the world, perhaps the West should take a leaf out of its own history book and remember that it takes a lot of patience in order to develop the models and the systems that you have today.
As you leave here today, I would like to leave you with a very personal message, which is what it is that I believe we should be doing as individuals, and this is really about being open-minded, open-minded to the fact that our hopes and dreams of creating prosperity for people around the world, creating and meaningfully putting a dent in poverty for hundreds of millions of people, has to be based in being open-minded, because these systems have good things and they have bad things.
In Makoko, very few systems and infrastructures exist.
There are real people trapped within these systems, and that's the other deeply strange thing about this algorithmically driven culture, because even if you're human, you have to end up behaving like a machine just to survive.
And we're munging it together into things like credit reports, into insurance premiums, into things like predictive policing systems, into sentencing guidelines.
And I don't know what's worse, that we built a system that seems to be entirely optimized for the absolute worst aspects of human behavior, or that we seem to have done it by accident, without even realizing that we were doing it, because we didn't really understand the systems that we were building, and we didn't really understand how to do anything differently with it.
What's allowed in these discourses, it shouldn't be something that's left up to unaccountable systems.
And we can see inside these systems that inequality of understanding does the same thing.
If there's one thing that we can do to start to improve these systems, it's to make them more legible to the people who use them, so that all of us have a common understanding of what's actually going on here.
The thing, though, I think most about these systems is that this isn't, as I hope I've explained, really about YouTube.
JB: Again, I think this responsibility is kind of up to all of us, that everything we do, everything we build, everything we make, needs to be made in a consensual discussion with everyone who's avoiding it; that we're not building systems intended to trick and surprise people into doing the right thing, but that they're actually involved in every step in educating them, because each of these systems is educational.
That's what I'm hopeful about, about even this really grim stuff, that if you can take it and look at it properly, it's actually in itself a piece of education that allows you to start seeing how complex systems come together and work and maybe be able to apply that knowledge elsewhere in the world.
You would have to wait a really long time before it happens, but believe me, quantum tunneling is a real phenomenon, and it has been observed in many systems.
And we also would be well informed to reach out to the people who do that work and get their expertise on how do we think about, how do we create systems around sustainability that perhaps take us from curbside recycling, which is a remarkable success across 40 years, across the United States and countries around the world, and lift us up to a broader horizon where we're looking at other forms of waste that could be lessened from manufacturing and industrial sources.
It should be built in to all the systems we use.
What's going to change the situation for the rest of the world is to try to steer away from systems built in the United States.
A single country, any single country in Europe cannot replace and build replacements for the U.S.-made operating systems and cloud services.
By building together open, free, secure systems, we can go around such surveillance, and then one country doesn't have to solve the problem by itself.
And to quote a fellow security researcher, Haroon Meer, one country only has to make a small wave, but those small waves together become a tide, and the tide will lift all the boats up at the same time, and the tide we will build with secure, free, open-source systems, will become the tide that will lift all of us up and above the surveillance state.
I knew there had to be all sorts of systems and techniques and training to have to live a full and meaningful, active life without sight.
And the fact that they recur in this way, in such a similar form but in such different belief systems, suggests, I think, that we should be skeptical of the truth of any particular version of these stories.
And not just individual machines, but fleets of locomotives, airplanes, entire systems like power grids, hospitals.
The hard approach, basically is that you start from strategy, requirements, structures, processes, systems, KPIs, scorecards, committees, headquarters, hubs, clusters, you name it.
We create dedicated structure processed systems, basically to deal with the new complexity of business.
When we don't cooperate we need more time, more equipment, more systems, more teams.
Next your non-essential systems start to shut down, like digestion.
BackNext