Standards
in sentence
2878 examples of Standards in a sentence
Nor that the Cars and Clothes in the background plates from 1934 did not seem match up too 1950s
' standards.
By todays standards, the film is pretty tame.
This movie has a very hard-to-swallow premise, even by this genre's
standards.
Even by the low
standards
of a National Lampoon movie, this one seemed especially boring and joyless.
It seemed that the movie was trying too hard to be "Something About Mary," but I didn't even like that movie and it still fell short of those
standards.
It's laughable to say the least, with bad effects, even for 1959
standards.
Though the premise sounds like the movie could be a lot of fun, it is ruined by inept directing from first-time director Andy Fickman, a clichéd and predictable screenplay, and acting that is even bad by direct-to-video
standards.
Not only does it fail to meet some of the most basic expectations of Madeleine L'Engle's fan base, it manages to defy the
standards
of scriptwriting, acting, special effects and, ultimately, respect for the audience.
That relatively speaking, Mash had some production quality, (by television standards) of that era and today, and therefore it is deserved of a two.
The quality of the special effects were laughable by today's standards, the character development too long, but all in all it was laugh out loud funny!
Why does this movie fall WELL below
standards?
To apply any sterner method of criticism would be pointless, since the usual
standards
of acting, writing, direction and such have never even been heard of by the creative "minds."
The whole squad is made up of sanctimonious egomaniacs who judge people whose actions go back decades by the
standards
of 2007.
Well our
standards
have gone into the toilet.
The film attempts to be "dreamlike", whereas in fact it's merely conceptionless collage of those shots that made it to the editing (and believe me, the
standards
weren't too high to start with).
Especially since it was directed by Priyadarshan, it was sad to see such dismal
standards.
The effects are OK on the whole, they are at least of the
standards
of the average science fiction TV show, and there are also a few scenes of blood splatter and a bit of fun gore as well.
It's very hard to stand looking at it if your
standards
regarding cinematography are just a little above average, because it looks the same as any ugly TV serial, if not worse.
The story line requires so many leaps of faith from the audience that its implausibility should have exceeded even Hollywood
standards.
Even by 1950's standards, the special effects are atrocious, except for a couple of underwater submarine sequences.
I realize Mike's goal was to torture the audience, but even that deserves some basic standards, such as the ability to actually see, hear or comprehend whatever it is that's supposed to be shocking.
As a result, the films, though popular in their day, were just awful by today's
standards.
Shame on Yash Raj films and Aditya Chopra who seems to have lost their intelligence over the years and providing steady fare of tripe in this piece of cinematic crap thats not even worth You Tube
standards.
this, is NOT one of those films it is one of the biggest pieces of tripe I have ever scene, the camera work is trying to be flashy but it really just crap the whole thing looks like the red shoe diaries, but without the sex, the only reason I bought this was I wanted to try out dvd and this was the cheapest one I could find, possibly the worst buy of my life and could have put you off dvd forever, the soundtrack is REALLY tacky and most of the movie is made up of endless repeats of clips from the first two films, why anyone would want to make a movie as awful as this is beyond me, if they had really attempted to make an original movie and failed I would be nicer in this review but they don't they just got the rights to reproduce stuff from the first two and then edit it and repeat it into this film with about maybe under 1 3rd original footage which is about up to the
standards
of film school students, DO NOT buy this movie.
The animation is up to the usual studio
standards
of the time, which are unquestionably higher than those of the present day.
And the action itself may have been impressive back in 1978, but it's routine by today's
standards.
Ultimately, this film suffers from both poor production values and lack of attention to the most basic
standards
of journalism.
Most of the plot was absolutely unrealistic, even by slasher film
standards.
If you take what's good of the original and build upon it and update key features too current standards, you can have a success.
The acting was wooden and stilted, even by early talkies
standards
(the exceptions being Lee Tracy and HB Warner, neither of whom can do wrong).
Back
Next
Related words
Living
Their
Countries
Would
Which
International
Global
Today
Economic
Should
There
Other
Growth
While
Could
People
Environmental
World
Labor
Higher
