Slightly
in sentence
1836 examples of Slightly in a sentence
Now, the renegade version does suck
slightly
less.
ALL MY SONS may have been
slightly
diluted for the screen as compared to the stage play which implicated corruption and wartime profiteering on a higher level than just one or two business men, but it's still powerful stuff and extremely well directed by Irving Reis.
But in the end, one only
slightly
edges out over the other, and not by much, which is really saying something in this case.
As usual, a well-mastered DVD from Warner Home Video, packaged with the
slightly
more interesting Decoy.
ANIMALYMPICS is definitely one of those films that pretty much defines its time and place - it's got a soft-rock score by 10CC's Graham Gouldman, some shiny chrome-effect logos and bumpers (the titles that pop up at the start of each segment), references to late seventies pop culture including disco fever and surf bums, and it's pre-political correctness so there are plenty of stereotypes (if you're offended by the joke early on about all Asian people looking the same, represented by a herd of puffins, you'd better tune out or get a sense of humour) and, believe it or not, a lot of none-too-thinly-veiled sexuality from our anthropomorphic heroes - the animators do have a habit of going
slightly
over the top with any movement that involves breasts or rear ends!
It is all very watchable but
slightly
confusing towards the end, which is a shame and may be my fault, that of the director or even of Mexico itself.
Though a few stretches of the story drag slightly, the overall effect of this film is true-to-life charm.
They thought it
slightly
implausible.
if anyone as to say this film was otherwise i think u would need your head testing :-)seens as this film was released in 1998 then maybe back then it would have been
slightly
better but not by much thanks for wasting my time hope this was useful to you D
I pictured a tedious
slightly
cheese-ball dated experience.
The Gestapo's Last Orgy is
slightly
more epic than most of the rest of the sub-genre, but that's not a good thing as it only means that it's even more boring.
Quiet thriller with great acting from Meryl Streep, taken a
slightly
different route with the paranoid performance from Roy Schnieder.
The ever-watchable Don Cheadle, who has turned in so many fine performances, here does it again, though he
slightly
overdoes the conscience-stricken angst (an emotion he has not yet learned to portray convincingly enough, perhaps because in real life he has not done anything bad enough to regret it sufficiently).
It is a very intelligent piece of writing with a
slightly
Chekhovian feel.
You make allowances for shooting on video, but you expect the cameraman to at least know how to hold it
slightly
steady or keep it in focus!
I normally have some understanding with telemovies, expecting them not to be brilliant but
slightly
entertaining, but this really is HORRIFIC for the telemovie image.
It's
slightly
creepy - and somewhat reminiscent of Lucio Fulci's masterpiece 'The Beyond'.
Another problem this film had was with censorship, there is virtually no gore in it whatsoever and I've got the '18' rated British DVD which is
slightly
longer than the American 'R' rated cut.
She is fully at ease, and completely believable in this late sixties,
slightly
risque, sexy role.
It's
slightly
flawed but hugely entertaining and not to mention hilarious.
First of all, when you slide some title off the shelf that never made it to theatrical release with a cover that features Dennis Hopper staring out at you in all his squinty-eyed,
slightly
soulful I-Am-a-Raving-Lunatic intensity. .
Made to hold a one frame pose for an exposure to be
slightly
changed to the next & next.
The science talk seemed
slightly
more scientific than usual (Well, not being a rocket scientist, for all I know they could have been exchanging formulas for melted butter - but it sounded right in the first part of the movie).
It may be
slightly
on the guy side of the chart, but for anyone that likes a little cheese now and then (especially if you were a young teen in the 80's), check this one out.
I at least am unable to name many other three hour long movies which I have not found
slightly
lengthy (not to say boring) at some stage.
This may be his first 'great' movie, but in some sections it betrays his relative inexperience as a film maker - it
slightly
loses focus in the central part of the movie and he occasionally over-eggs his metaphors (something Kurosawa was always inclined to do).
It starts off pretty well with a bunch of very attractive English party holidaymakers (very realistic, I've seen their types all around the world) hooking up for what is going to be a
slightly
sordid adventure.
All seven characters are complete stereotypes (really bad guy, ruthless guy, good guy and not so bad guy forced to do really bad things; party girl who gets knocked off early; middle ground party girl and
slightly
less inclined party girl).
Joe Pesci is one of the very few actors who can play either the comedy role;i.e a
slightly
dimwitted yet funny character, or the serious role as a violent, erratic henchman/psycho; i.e in Scorcese's Goodfellas and Casino.
It could have been
slightly
better had it been shorter or if the story had been told at a faster pace.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Different
Movie
Would
There
Other
Their
Better
About
Could
Higher
People
Growth
While
Still
Actually
First
After
Years
Average