Secular
in sentence
783 examples of Secular in a sentence
Arab Fathers and SonsThe problem of succession in the Arab
secular
republics highlights their predicament in the transition to a post-revolutionary phase, for succession in regimes that fail to build strong institutions always risks triggering a systemic crisis.
As products of revolutionary military takeovers, these
secular
nationalist regimes failed to produce genuine popular legitimacy and have had to fall back on the dynastic succession practiced by the regimes they toppled.
But, with the decline of
secular
nationalism and Islamism’s rise, the hidden electoral power of the Muslim Brotherhood poses a mortal threat to the regime and its strategic alliance with the West.
In modern times, it took the threat of nuclear war to spark efforts to mend ties between East and West – and even then the rapprochement was spearheaded primarily by Russia’s
secular
authorities.
At one extreme you find countries like France, whose constitution defines the State as
secular
( laique ).
No one could credibly argue that, say, Denmark is less committed to liberal democracy or is less tolerant than, say, France or Italy, despite the fact that Denmark recognizes an official state church and France and Italy are avowedly
secular.
The post-Ottoman order that emerged a century ago – an order based on
secular
Arab nationalism – has already crumbled.
And it certainly won’t reconcile the sacred with the
secular.
In this case, the condition is slow economic growth, also known as
secular
stagnation, caused by depressed investment, which in turn reflects financial problems and policy uncertainty.
But the retention of such laws is easier to understand in the case of countries that incorporate religious teachings into their criminal law – no matter how much others may regret it – than in a
secular
democracy like India.
According to one view, he is betting that social conservatives and white blue-collar supporters in rural areas will vote on the basis of nationalist and religious sentiment and antipathy toward
secular
coastal elites, rather than for their own financial interests.
At the center of the storm are Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, head of the moderately Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP), and Yasar Buyukanit, Chief of the General Staff of the Turkish military, which regards itself as the guardian of the
secular
republican tradition established by Kemal Ataturk.
When Erdogan contemplated moving from the prime minister’s job to the presidency earlier this spring, the military and
secular
political parties indicated profound dissatisfaction.
General Buyukanit said in April that the country’s new president must be
secular
“not just in words, but in essence.”
The
secular
establishment argues that the AKP’s moderation thus far reflects the checks and balances implied by secularist control of the presidency.
Massive public demonstrations were held in Istanbul to support Turkey’s Kemalist
secular
tradition.
As part of that effort, BRAC, which is already the world’s largest private
secular
education provider, plans to invest at least $280 million to reach 2.7 million additional girls and train 75,000 teachers by 2019.
By demanding severe punishment for those guilty of war crimes – not the Pakistani Army, long gone, but their local collaborators in groups like Jamaat-e-Islami, Al Badar, Al Shams, and the Razakar irregulars – the protesters are also implicitly describing the society in which they wish to live: secular, pluralist, and democratic.
While some see no contradiction, the fact that many of the collaborators who killed
secular
and pro-democracy Bengalis in 1971 claimed to be doing so in the name of Islam points to an evident tension.
The debate between religious fundamentalism and
secular
democracy is not a new one on the subcontinent.
We cannot treat the influence of religious faith in purely
secular
terms.
Those who feel that their faith compels them to act in a way destructive of mutual respect must be persuaded that this is a wrong reading of their faith; otherwise, such a faith-based compulsion will always trump
secular
political arguments.
In today’s crisis, muddling through would be a recipe for a continuation of the crisis and
secular
stagnation of the type once described by Alvin Hansen, a contemporary of Keynes.
For 30 years, the US government supported
secular
rulers who justified their iron grip on power by insisting that the choice was between them and “the Islamists” – whom they portrayed as religious zealots bent on taking their countries back to the Middle Ages.
Despite massive evidence to the contrary, many people – not least theologians – fear that we live in a
secular
age.
The relation of divine and
secular
fuels passionate debate throughout the Islamic world and in Israel, but the Orthodox idea of sinfonia – the harmonious unity between society, state, and church – constitutes a distinctive challenge to the acceptance of liberal democracy.
After all, the victory of the
secular
Awami National Party (ANP) in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier Province is a strong indication that people there have rejected religious political forces and violence.
First, the rise of an Arab political class that is more influenced by religion than by
secular
nationalism has eroded the main structural barrier to Turkish engagement.
A doctor may choose a
secular
path, or try to integrate a traditional faith with a modern profession.
Garang fought for a united, secular, and democratic Sudan, a lofty dream that the Islamist regime in Khartoum admittedly has had no intention of implementing.
Back
Next
Related words
Stagnation
Religious
Which
Their
Political
Between
World
State
Country
Government
Democracy
Military
Countries
People
Other
About
Would
There
Society
Years