Score
in sentence
1768 examples of Score in a sentence
The saddest part about this film is that they had everything in place to make the greatest western ever and they blew it!!! the costumes are perfect,good actors, there are 2 music scores the orchestrail
score
is wonderful, and keeps with the classic spirit of the old timey Lone Ranger alive, the second
score
is a series of songs by country music artest like Merle Haggerd, and The Statler Brothers and those songs like "The Man in the Mask" are so bad that they are funny.
After that we get a detailed reconstruction of post-war Scandinavia with lots of amazing cars, electronic equipment and interior design; a minimal jazz score, nice cinematography and stylish titling.
He and Joanna Going are both fantastic in this film: too bad the screenplay, co-stars, directing, and
score
couldn't match those two.
1. the music is actually pretty good, it has an epic
score
that sticks in your head for days.
The only positive features to credit are the adroit use of some Prokofiev and Stravinsky themes in the music
score
and the inclusion of some of the distasteful but nevertheless accurate actions of the despot.
The music
score
(?) is three trite notes played ad nauseam.
Thomas Susanto's pedestrian cinematography, the laughably lousy dubbing, the excruciatingly overlong 102 minute running time, the sappy theme song, and Gatot Sudarto's cornball
score
add further abject insult to already appalling injury.
The generally atmospheric
score
has some absurd parts (like the music that plays during the first appearance of a monkey), and there is a truly awful fantasy scene involving....a gorilla.
Missed cues, lighting faux pas, off-screen terror, an unbelievably inane score, and of course John Agar trying his level best to be the core of the film with an earnest performance amidst this muck.
This movie fails miserably on every possible level, not the least of which are dreadfully wooden performances, dime-store special effects, an irritating musical score, and, most of all, a story lacking even the slightest hint of tension or suspense.
The music is a classic
score
and fits the movie very well.
Even the
score
was incongruous and jarring.
There's an excellent music
score
by Luciano Michelini.
This is seriously the worst movie I have ever seen, right from the start the movie goes straight down hill with its cheesy music score, poor acting, and total lack or real story or plot.
The only halfway memorable scene was a bad attempt at comedy when they passed gas while waiting for a
score.
Still, there are other aspects apart of the film that work - the cinematography is well done, Rachel Portman contributes a lovely score, and while no one is at their best, Liam Neeson, Joan Allen, Patricia Arquette, and Tate Donovan work well in their roles.
Putting Keanu and Diaz in the same movie should at least provide some eye candy, but Baigelman even cops out on that score, grudging his actors up with little positive effect.
The musical
score
is weak and the dialogue is terrible.
I do not generally appreciate light-weight attempts at creating humourous stories, which means that "Anita no perd el Tren" cannot
score
very high for me.
There are three major problems with this movie: 1) The plot - or should I say plots - are all over the place, there are some characters who get a lot of screen time but serve little purpose, 2) There are only 4 fight scenes in total, some of them completely unrelated to the main plot and some taking place in the dark, 3) The music
score
is overzealous and overbearing.
Strange as it may seem, this is really the most annoying thing about this film: the
score
persistently tries to convince you that you're watching some sort of grand epic, instead of the low-budget limited-action film you are indeed watching.
Instead it was more like MacGyver on drugs with outdated breakbeat music as a
score.
The only real impact comes from the impressive firefighting sequences, and Hans Zimmer's majestic score, which remains one of my all-time favourites.
It's still dull and badly constructed, and even the print shown on cable is now emasculated of its original James Brown
score.
A great
score
from the ever reliable Goldsmith and some funny scenes in Yosemite between the main three are not enough to cover the gaping chasms in the plot, and the frankly embarassing attempts at humour serve only to alienate even die hard trekkies.
It's not even that the film is really too 'dated', though it does of course carry the significantly crude and stupid music in the film (from the band on stage in one scene, to Alaimo "performing" if you could call that drek that, to the regular generic score).
How can something so awful
score
this high?
But the plot of the movie, I would have to give it a
score
of 1 out of 10.
A well-crafted score, appropriately based upon the action, is contributed by Hal Beckett.
I really just cannot see how those people are able to give that
score.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Music
Musical
Which
There
Cinematography
Great
Would
Acting
About
Their
Really
Story
Other
Beautiful
Could
Excellent
Scenes
Script
Thing