Scientific in sentence

2039 examples of Scientific in a sentence

So what I want to argue is this is one example of where a systematic, really scientific approach can actually bring you a real understanding of pheromones.

If you're not mindful of communications, scientific conversations can have a lot of blocking.

Finally, we can talk about this in a scientific conference.

First, it's got scientific value.

We unwittingly assume that values like justice, beauty, kindness, are akin to scientific quantities, like length, mass and weight.

As post-Enlightenment creatures, we tend to assume that scientific thinking holds the key to everything of importance in our world, but the world of value is different from the world of science.

Every day we face issues like climate change or the safety of vaccines where we have to answer questions whose answers rely heavily on scientific information.

Blaise Pascal was a 17th-century mathematician who tried to bring scientific reasoning to the question of whether or not he should believe in God, and his wager went like this: Well, if God doesn't exist but I decide to believe in him nothing much is really lost.

Now the fact is though, for most of us, most scientific claims are a leap of faith.

We can't really judge scientific claims for ourselves in most cases.

Most of us were taught in school that the reason we should believe in science is because of the scientific method.

It's quite hard to persuade the scientific community to say, "Yes, we know something, this is true."

So despite the popularity of the concept of paradigm shifts, what we find is that actually, really major changes in scientific thinking are relatively rare in the history of science.

So finally that brings us to one more idea: If scientists judge evidence collectively, this has led historians to focus on the question of consensus, and to say that at the end of the day, what science is, what scientific knowledge is, is the consensus of the scientific experts who through this process of organized scrutiny, collective scrutiny, have judged the evidence and come to a conclusion about it, either yea or nay.

So we can think of scientific knowledge as a consensus of experts.

It's a jury of men and women with Ph.D.s, and unlike a conventional jury, which has only two choices, guilty or not guilty, the scientific jury actually has a number of choices.

Even 30 years ago, when TED got started, there was very little scientific work on consciousness.

And since then, there's been a real explosion, a flowering of scientific work on consciousness.

Now, I'm a scientific materialist at heart.

I want a scientific theory of consciousness that works, and for a long time, I banged my head against the wall looking for a theory of consciousness in purely physical terms that would work.

On the other hand, we don't know how to accommodate it into our scientific view of the world.

Now, I don't know if this theory is right, but it's actually perhaps the leading theory right now in the science of consciousness, and it's been used to integrate a whole range of scientific data, and it does have a nice property that it is in fact simple enough you can write it on the front of a t-shirt.

I'm an artist who's worked for many years with biology, with scientific processes, so living material is not uncommon for me.

I found countless scientific studies, research papers, journal articles, all citing incredible work with this one organism, and I'm going to share a few of those with you.

A lot of my work draws on the scientific research, so this pays homage to the maze experiment but in a different way.

But C4 is just one example of the potential for data-driven scientific approaches to open new fronts on medical problems that are centuries old.

But the scientific possibilities rally people with diverse interests into working intensely together.

Maybe you're a scientific atheist or an unscientific atheist, and you don't believe in God, and you're not happy with it.

So maybe physics can fill this blank, and indeed, since about the late 1960s or around 1970, physicists have purported to give a purely scientific explanation of how a universe like ours could have popped into existence out of sheer nothingness, a quantum fluctuation out of the void.

That's a very primitive view of what a scientific law is.

Related words