Example collocations logo

Scientific in sentence

2039 examples of Scientific in a sentence

Again, the amount of scientific research to study tropical agricultural is a tiny fraction of the research expenditures to study "rich-country" agriculture in the temperate climate.
Without such aid, these scientific advances will not be forthcoming, since the needed scientific resources are almost all concentrated in the advanced economies, and normal market forces will not lead to their mobilization.
And for all of the developing world, a re-orientation of the aid effort to mobilize the scientific and technological knowledge needed to conquer unsolved problems of tropical health, agriculture, environment, energy use, and other areas that will not be overcome by economic reforms alone.
To move from these useful but limited devices to the kind of brain-machine interactions that Musk is seeking would require major scientific breakthroughs.
US regulations drove Phil Kennedy, a pioneer in the use of computers to enable paralyzed patients to communicate by thought alone, to have electrodes implanted in his own brain in order to make further scientific progress.
Tim Cannon doesn’t have the scientific or medical qualifications of Phil Kennedy or Kevin Warwick, but that hasn’t stopped him from co-founding a Pittsburgh company that implants bionic devices, often after he has first tried them out on himself.
Warwick says that scientific research has benefited from what the cyborg enthusiasts have done.
Each time I publish a scientific essay, I attract the attention of a dozen self-proclaimed messiahs eager to impart their divinely inspired ideas, which invariably lack higher mathematics (or, in the case of the black-hole sentinels, rely on elevated but meaningless mathematics).
Their conviction that they represent the Alpha and Omega of knowledge is as rigid as their scientific illiteracy.
Doom sells; scientific empiricism, not so much.
While I intended only to suggest that the black holes would be considered seriously as a scientific phenomenon, my words were interpreted to mean that the black holes could pose a serious threat to Earth.
The obsession with doomsday scenarios diverts attention from far more consequential scientific issues, such as securing nuclear power plants and developing safer methods for conducting biological research.
This risk is all the more acute in a world where scientific and technological progress is taking us into uncharted territory.
Suspicions about such problems--especially about drug-induced suicidal behavior and sensitization to depression--have been rumbling for years, but searching scientific investigations have only just begun.
Over the past century, our scientific understanding of germs has improved so much that every virus and bacteria can now be quickly diagnosed and isolated.
But something important for scientific advance is missing in our children’s lives.
A sense of wonder about future scientific progress is lacking; a growing cultural disinterest in science is taking hold.
Moreover, increasing legal roadblocks to scientific progress are stifling inventiveness everywhere.
Indifference – indeed, sometimes outright hostility – to scientific progress exists there as well.
Everywhere you look, the excitement about scientific advance that gripped Anatole France is being replaced by ignorant fear and incipient censorship of scientific thinking.
In the popular mind, science is blamed for deadly weapons and environmental pollution, even if the decisions to produce weapons are political, not scientific in nature, and the main reason for pollution is the profit motive, not scientific progress.
In place of today’s indifference and sometimes outright hostility, we must create conditions that will nurture scientific research and restore the central position of science in the culture of Western societies.
If the spirit of scientific exploration and creativity is to be renewed in our time, we must create educational systems and schoolbooks informed by the spirit of Primo Levi.
Simply put, women have long suffered in their pursuit of science careers, and the global scientific community must recommit to making them full partners in the quest for human knowledge.
Achieving gender parity would yield an enormous payoff for scientific discovery.
Evidence suggests that bias is endemic in nearly every scientific field, and that institutional discrimination is still crippling careers and impeding scientific innovation.
And yet, while individual tweaks can be beneficial, the world’s scientific community must move beyond piecemeal solutions to tackle gender bias in a more holistic way.
Genetic prediction marks the intersection of scientific possibilities, economic interests, and consumer hopes and expectations.
But the basics of global warming are not in scientific dispute.
PORTSMOUTH – Nearly 30 years have passed since the nuclear accident at Chernobyl, and the scientific community is still arguing about the impact radiation is having on the ecosystem surrounding the reactor.
BackNext