Example collocations logo

Scientific in sentence

2039 examples of Scientific in a sentence

It is in times of crisis that Utopian ideas about ways of guaranteeing human happiness flourish, often claiming some scientific basis.
The scientific community rigorously seeks consensus about knowledge produced so far, but it knows that there is still much more to be discovered.
All scientific knowledge is therefore preliminary, and will be extended, complemented, or replaced by new knowledge.
But, whereas the scientific community embraces uncertainty, remains ever curious, and is confident about the power of science and technology to create new opportunities for mankind’s collective future, other segments of society do not necessarily share this outlook.
Achieving that goal requires neither a technological breakthrough nor a scientific discovery.
In addition, scientific research on this most accessible of human organs will continue to identify innovative treatments and modes of prevention, which may well become applicable to other cancers.
The challenges faced by a major power like the US require rigorous analysis of information according to the best scientific principles.
Climate change, for example, poses dire threats to the planet that must be assessed according to prevailing scientific norms and the evolving capacity of climate science.
The Nobel Prize-winning global scientific process called the Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has set the gold standard for scientific rigor in analyzing the threats of human-induced climate change.
In the US, however, the attitudes of President Bush, leading Republicans, and now Sarah Palin, have been the opposite of scientific.
The White House did all it could for eight years to hide the overwhelming scientific consensus that humans are contributing to climate change.
They reflect the fact that a significant portion of American society, which currently votes mainly Republican, rejects or is simply unaware of basic scientific evidence regarding climate change, biological evolution, human health, and other fields.
All of the great religions have traditions of fruitful interchange with – and, indeed, support for – scientific inquiry.
Pope John Paul II declared his support for the basic science of evolution, and Roman Catholic bishops are strongly in favor of limiting human-induced climate change, based on the scientific evidence.
Global scientific processes like the IPCC are critical, because they offer our best hope of forging a consensus based on the scientific evidence.
Since the mid-nineteenth century, the West has depended on technical innovation and scientific derring-do for its influence and growth.
I believe that it is obsolete, pedagogically disastrous, and ignores the tremendous scientific advances of the twentieth century.
Because this sequence is for all students, what will be retained in the future are the stories and, most importantly, a scientific way of thinking.
In fact, recent scientific evidence indicates that the Neolithic Revolution – the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture – spread mostly because farmers displaced hunters, not because hunters learned from them.
The invention in the mid-1970's of technology to clone and sequence DNA opened new vistas for research, and its use on humans and other mammals has been enormously successful in terms of scientific discovery.
More recently, the Ministry of Justice added the Dynasty Foundation, established in 2002 by the well-known scientist and telecommunications mogul Dmitry Zimin, to its list of “foreign agents,” most likely with the goal of stifling the organization’s efforts to build a modern scientific community.
This repression has had a serious impact on the scientific community, with Russia’s top scientific minds – unwilling to remain in an environment where greed and corruption stifle creativity and exploration – joining investors and capital in fleeing the country.
Polls of climate researchers, as well as analysis of thousands of scientific publications, consistently show a 97-98% consensus that human-caused emissions are causing global warming.
Indeed, these efforts have been so successful that few members of the public are aware of the scientific consensus on the fundamentals of climate change.
Linking genomics, global health is not only a scientific and policy issue, but also a diplomatic one.
Their study lends scientific supportto several such projects underway in Europe aimed at proving that hydrogen gas, converted from water via electrolysis – think of it as natural gas minus the polluting carbon – and stored, for example, in subterranean salt caverns, can smooth out fluctuations inherent in solar and wind energy.
Climategate exposed a side of the scientific community most people never get to see.
But substituting spin for scientific rigor is a terrible strategy.
Some religious leaders also condemned the use of modern scientific technology to replace sexual intercourse, even when it could not lead to conception.
As human affairs become increasingly complex and morally exigent, future generations will need both scientific and humanistic learning – and they will need them more than ever.
BackNext