Example collocations logo

Scheme in sentence

835 examples of Scheme in a sentence

This means that the program’s leaks need to be repaired, not that the entire scheme should be abandoned.
The announcement of the OMT scheme in July 2012 reduced interest rates for companies and governments alike and returned much-needed private capital to crisis-hit countries, thereby helping to soften the blow of the deep recession on Europe’s periphery.
A recent poll shows that only one-third of Germans now favor the scheme, while a majority oppose it.
For example, the inspiration for the EGF, America’s Trade Adjustment Assistance, introduced by the Kennedy administration in 1962, is a purely national scheme.
Nevertheless, the EGF’s rules need to be tightened, lest the scheme comes to be regarded as a political gimmick.
The very simplicity of this scheme will likely ensure high visibility and reasonable take-up rates.
Napoleon saw the scheme as a potential basis for a single world currency.
Fearing that the system was fragile, the government opened its coffers in 1787, bailing out private investors who had lost in an immense speculative scheme to corner shares in a reorganized East India Company.
The authors had inadvertently omitted data, used a questionable weighting scheme, and employed an erroneous observation on GDP growth.
Another innovative idea that Hong Kong and Guangdong are exploring is the “P2E2” scheme.
The Great Leap Forward had aspects of a Ponzi scheme, an investment fraud which attempts to draw in successive rounds of investors through word-of-mouth tales of outsize returns.
He appears to have been worried, like the manager of a Ponzi scheme, that any hint of doubt could cause the whole movement to crash.
Implementation of such a scheme is unlikely, however.
Second, such a scheme would impose large costs on only a few companies in a few countries.
Under such a scheme, the Soviet Union in 1986, for example, would have been required to pay for the costs that the Chernobyl accident imposed on European farmers and health-care systems.
The TRIP’s scheme failed to recognize this.
Sweden’s pension system recently created a link between national income growth and benefits, but the reforms did not include creating GDP-linked bonds, a natural adjunct to such a scheme.
The current scheme breeds structural fiscal deficits, excessive reliance on imports, endemic corruption, money laundering, narcotics trafficking, and massive capital flight.
The European Commission has argued that a fully-fledged banking union would need to rest on four pillars: a single deposit protection scheme covering all EU (or eurozone) banks; a common resolution authority and common resolution fund, at least for systemically important and cross-border banks; a single European supervisor for the same banks; and a uniform rule book for prudential supervision of all banks in Europe.
Could another macroeconomic Ponzi scheme really be avoided?
Not only would such a board smack of colonialism and be politically untenable; the scheme would also lack the flexibility needed to avoid a depression in Puerto Rico, while reassuring everyone, including investors, that fiscal policy will remain prudent in the future.
The Ministry of Trade and Industry established a sensible incentive scheme for export-oriented investment and a black empowerment program that encourages investors to help the previously neglected workforce.
Moreover, they should agree on a scheme that results in a credible future path for the price of carbon, which would give the private sector the predictability it needs to invest in energy-saving and clean energy.
The US delegation suggested a totally different scheme from the one being discussed.
In the US scheme, the volume of emissions would be subject to permits or quotas, which could be traded in a market established for that purpose.
In the end, that scheme was chosen in Kyoto with the hope that the US, which had proposed it, would then ratify it.
A version of this scheme is already in place in Singapore, where ministers receive bonuses if the government hits targets for GDP growth, income growth (including a measure of how earnings are progressing for the bottom 20%), and unemployment.
The first explicit scheme was introduced in America after the Great Depression and initially seemed an unmitigated success.
In response to the recent protests, the government has proposed an additional risk-sharing scheme: some (thus far undecided) part of a five-percentage-point increase in the mandatory retirement savings rate, to be paid by employers, will go to a “solidarity fund” that can finance transfers to people receiving low pensions.
The STISA scheme places scientific cooperation above national politics.
BackNext