Example collocations logo

Scenario in sentence

1592 examples of Scenario in a sentence

The most likely scenario is that investors attributed the steep initial rise in credit flows after 1989 to sound policies in emerging markets.
The first scenario is a continuation of the current situation.
In the second scenario, Russia and the EU would pool their efforts and collaborate.
This preponderance of military spending applies to all ten years of Obama’s medium-term scenario.
The rationale for this scenario is straightforward.
The risk to this benign scenario is, of course, that Marine Le Pen wins in France.
Given that China’s TFP growth has averaged 4% for more than 30 years, and is likely to slow in the coming decade, this scenario is improbable.
Similarly, the euro-collapse scenario in which such countries successfully pressure the ECB to inflate, compelling Germany to abandon the euro, has shown no signs of developing.
In fact, barring the worst-case scenario under Trump, it is possible that the slowdown in global trade in recent years will turn out to be a temporary phenomenon.
How realistic is the possibility of scenario French return to NATO’s military fold?
Such a scenario would reverse the gloomy demographic and economic trends in Russia’s eastern territories, and would strengthen Russia’s geopolitical position in the process.
In the worst-case scenario, the very concept of global climate policy would lose all value, with decades of climate alarmism giving way to fatalism.
The other, more promising scenario involves a fundamental shift in how the problem of climate change is understood, and thus in how potential solutions are framed.
In such a scenario, military interventions will continue, but not in the postmodern form aimed at upholding order (exemplified by Western powers’ opposition to genocide in Kosovo and Sierra Leone).
In this scenario, Germany would work to uphold Liberal Order 1.0 globally and to preserve Liberal Order 2.0 within Europe.
Neither scenario would be appealing.
A “cliff-edge” scenario – in which the end of the two-year negotiating period brings a sudden change to an unclear or even undecided regulatory regime – must be avoided at all costs.
In fact, neither scenario is plausible.
In the extremely unlikely scenario that attacks dropped by 25%, the world would save about US$22 billion.
We could save about 105 lives a year in this best-case scenario.
Unfortunately, such a scenario seems farfetched.
An alternative scenario relies on the powerful unifying impact of human capital, the defining factor in the quest for global influence.
But even this scenario may be too optimistic.
Optimists imagine a scenario in which production is rationalized, pipelines are built, grids are interconnected, and gas from Bolivia, Argentina, or elsewhere fuels growth throughout the continent, benefiting everyone in the process.
Are the US and its European allies prepared for a scenario in which the agreement with Russia breaks down and Syria’s chemical weapons are not destroyed under international control?
According to the CBO’s alternative fiscal scenario, growth in Social Security is comparatively modest, from 4.8% of GDP in 2010 to 6.2% in 2035.
Estimates from the International Energy Agency (IEA) suggest that in a “new policies” scenario that is broadly comparable with national commitments enshrined in the Paris agreement, the world would need to invest $68.3 trillion in energy-related systems between now and 2040.
But while the absolute increase in required investment is moderate, the IEA’s low-carbon scenario entails a dramatic change in the pattern of investment.
And lower investment would be matched by a decline in cumulative fossil-fuel revenues amounting to as much as $34 trillion more than under the IEA’s “new policies” scenario, owing not only to lower volumes of oil, gas, and coal consumed, but also to significantly lower prices.
For example, if China took measures in a future crisis scenario to disrupt the buildup of American combat power in certain places and at certain times, the US would need to create alternative points of entry for its reinforcements, delaying its initial and follow-on responses.
BackNext