Example collocations logo

Safer in sentence

549 examples of Safer in a sentence

The rejected proposals are thus good policy: money-market funds should be made safer – via capital requirements and liquidity restrictions – because they already receive a de facto government guarantee.
Their steady value makes them appear safer to investors than they are to the world’s financial system.
We cannot build a safer system if we do not raise global requirements and if we tolerate non-compliance with the rules.
Beyond FukushimaVIENNA – Nuclear power has become safer since the devastating accident one year ago at Fukushima, Japan.
It will become safer still in the coming years, provided that governments, plant operators, and regulators do not drop their guard.
Specifically, they should revisit the consensus that banks will become gradually safer, and their required capital should amount to no more than 10% of their assets.
We Europeans have assumed for too long that it is cheaper and safer to let the US solve our problems, even in our own backyard.
During that time, kidnapping, torture, and murder had a stranglehold over the Latin American press; stenography was an infinitely safer choice for those reporting the news.
But disseminating these safer strains is proving difficult.
For the same reasons, these regions fail to diversify their food staples to include safer crops such as millet, maize, or beans.
Traumatized Israelis cling to the false hope that their lives will be made safer by incremental unilateral withdrawals from occupied areas, while Palestinians see their remnant territories reduced to little more than human dumping grounds surrounded by a provocative “security barrier” that embarrasses Israel’s friends and fails to bring safety or stability.
To be sure, we are told that the financial system is simpler, safer, and fairer.
But this consensus misses an important point: the financial sector in the US and globally has become much more unstable in recent decades, and there is nothing in any of the reform efforts undertaken since the near-meltdown in 2008 that will make it safer.
The sooner the US and the rest of the world fully recognize this, the safer the world economy will be.
Raising such questions when nanotechnology is still in its infancy may result in better, safer products and less long-term liability for industry.
It thus would also contribute to making our financial systems safer.
Even though we failed to achieve our highest aspirations in Reykjavik, the summit was nonetheless, in the words of my former counterpart, “a major turning point in the quest for a safer and secure world.”
Moreover, increased UK production would lower world prices, making countries with fewer or no shale-gas resources safer.
Investments in new technologies are justifiable only if they contribute to a safer, more integrated world.
With its renewal, we will also renew our hope for a fairer and safer world.
After years of decline, the economy is growing; after numerous financial scandals, the banking system is safer.
That vision, however remote, is much safer in Monti’s hands.
As the worldwide polio burden plummets, we become safer from importations of the virus.
The riskiest institutions were not the largest: firms like J. P. Morgan and HSBC proved safer than others, and neither sought nor needed state funding.
But if scientists can develop better delivery systems or synthetic agents that are safer, cheaper, and easier to manufacture, enormous opportunities will be created for complex drugs that could be given without injections.
The world would no doubt be a safer place, and the power that had helped to impose such inspections would be praised for its far-sighted statesmanship.
It is far from clear how Prabhu's grand vision of a safer, cleaner, and speedier Indian railway system will be achieved in practice.
Jon Huntsman, a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, is addressing this directly – insisting that we should force the largest banks to break up and to become safer.
They should fear a future of overwhelming pollution, inadequate education, poor working conditions, increasingly extreme weather events, geopolitical conflict, and the destruction of programs and policies created to build a safer, more secure, and more prosperous future for all.
Decommissioning nuclear reactors may make us feel safer, but we should acknowledge that this will often mean compensating for the lost output with more reliance on coal, meaning more emissions that contribute to global warming, and more deaths, both from coal extraction and air pollution.
BackNext