Example collocations logo

Roles in sentence

1991 examples of Roles in a sentence

The film stars some very big stars, in roles they probably would like to rethink taking.
I believe that it was one of Gary Cooper's finest roles.
Samuel L. Jackson and Queen Latifah are great in supporting roles and the movie has a nifty hip-hop soundtrack that adds pace to a solid uptown crime drama.
David Warner and David Suchet excel in their (small) roles.
I didn't particularly LIKE the actors playing her parents but I even really liked them in these roles, very much so.
It was one of Cynthia's first roles.
I thought to myself "maybe it's just misunderstood to those unfamiliar with Ellroy's novel" But frankly, it just never felt right,,, and then it went more and more uncomfortably wrong; the actors in their roles, the soundtrack vs. certain scenes, the story fumbling it's way around with not enough mention of The Dahlia herself (which really drove the characters in the novel).
They're right in tune with the director's amoral consciousness, and act the heck out of their roles.
I reckon that writer/director John Gilling then added some fictional elements to his film, like the characterizations of the main roles, since Hare's persona is almost blackly comical and Dr. Knox' attitude is stubborn and typically obnoxious like nearly every scientist in horror cinema.
Even having the same actors play other roles.
She should probably be cast in these kind of roles in the future instead of lead roles.
The other actors fit their roles to a T. As far as O'Toole, what can be said?
All the actors do a fantastic job in their roles, especially Malcolm McDowell.
First, there is the pleasure of seeing a bunch of good actors working together with great chemistry, some of them (like Pitt and Clooney) certainly not in their "traditional" roles.
However if you understand that the world you live in has shades of grey then here is a multi coloured chunk to digest.I liked the central characters and found them very believable.This film shows particular skill in having very rounded supporting roles.
The screenplay is a joke, with major characters missing from the original novel and the acting from almost everybody in the film is down right horrible and that's really because most of the roles are miscast to begin with.
There are three movies that these two have important roles, but this is the only one where their roles are of equal importance.
Everyone is very believable in the roles and the story lines are relate-able.
Russel Crowe and Salma Hayek does a great job in this film playing two difficult roles.
This movie is full of fun; Cary Grant and Myrna Loy should have had more comedy roles together!
There is not too much storyline and everyone seems relaxed and happy with their respective roles.
The story is narrated by two cheetahs who at least attempt to sound African, but all other roles are done in various accents - none of them consistent or ethnic.
A line-up of fine actors in obliging guest roles leave much to be desired like Boman Irani, Makrand, Tinu Anand or even Rajat Kapoor who recently gave a smashing performance in the very sleek Madhur Bhandarkar's 'Corporate'.
This movie makes light of some of those old fashioned sexist ideas,(domestic violence, man/wife roles) so may offend some, but then it was made for a different time.
It is just too bad that there weren't really any roles written for her during her time at MGM.
Probably the last of La Crawford's great diva roles, her Eva Phillips gnaws through every last shred of scenery until John Ireland wisely decides to put all of us out of Joan's misery via car accident.
The girls and their male friends, played by actors obviously too old for the roles, chatter away, make out, talk trash and do what real losers do....but its not much fun to watch.
I hope to see them both in more leading roles in the near future.
They were all perfect in their given roles.
Hrithik and Aishwarya are good in their respective roles, but there is nothing brilliant here about either of the performances.
BackNext