Roles
in sentence
1991 examples of Roles in a sentence
I like him too, but have generally found that he should "stick to what he does best" and focus on comedic
roles.
If this movie questions Japanese society and their values and roles, than this is a country that i would not like to visit or bother to know.
Cage has had these same kind of performance problems in other
roles
that require more of a Jimmy Stewart type character.
Cage keeps taking these roles, perhaps because he likes those kind of movies but his own energy as an actor doesn't lend itself to them, though he's gotten better at it with repeated attempts.
He should leave these type of
roles
to less interesting actors who would fully commit to the film and spend his energy and considerable talent in more off beat
roles
and films where he can be his crazy interesting self.
She obviously wasn't chosen for her astounding competence in dramatic
roles
but most probably for her nice legs.
Ajay who is especially smooth in these kind of
roles
was also a disappointment.
And I don't always agree with people, but what Calamine has said is very true, it is time for the girls to move on to better
roles.
When In Rome is good for audiences of younger generation but the adults who were kids when the twins were babies want to follow the twins in their successes and so hence I think we adults would like to see them make movies of different kinds, maybe some that are like the sixth sense, the hour, chocolat, that sort of movie - not saying to have just serious movies for them, humour ones too yes, but rather see them in different
roles
to what they have been playing in their more recent movies like this one and New York Minute.
Here, Michael O'Shea, in one of his first roles, portrays London, and his performance is both rugged and sympathetic.
You have to feel sorry for Robert Wagner and Tom Bosley, I'm sure they didn't see
roles
like this in the twilight of their careers.
More interesting are the "original" Joel Cairo and Mr. Gutman, who competently deliver many of the individual tics but almost nothing of the set-changing atmospherics of their successors in the roles, Peter Lorre and Sydney Greenstreet.
The predominantly black production staff couldn't allow the antagonist be black, so they swapped Rutger's and Ice-T's
roles.
Another would be the dirty scruffy looking guy with the jean jacket, he could have played more
roles
in this movie that might have made the movie more interesting, instead, the movie played this guy as just another loser out there making unknown calls while he sleeps with his girlfriend and then drops his part and cuts him off until the end which was a waste, I was disappointed in his part in the end.
This is not one of Cusack's deeper roles, but who in the hell could not be smitten by Beckinsale.
Neither really seemed to be able to break out to other types of roles, assuming they were simply typecast.
John Ritter, whom Knotts worked with in "Three's Company," was able to transcend his genre, branching out successfully into dramatic
roles
like "The Dreamer of Oz," but the closest Knotts ever got was a small role in "Pleasantville."
The new actor and actress to play the lead
roles
weren't good at all, they should of had the original actor (Brendon Fraiser) and original actress (i forgot her name) so this movie gets the 0 out of ten rating, not a film that you can sit down and watch and enjoy, this is a film that you turn to another channel or take it back to the shop if hired or bought.
Sorry, but Lithgow and Sutherland deserve better
roles.
One of the few bright spots in this clunker of a comedy is David Morse, a highly underrated actor mostly known for his supporting
roles
as villains.
Even though Deanna Durbin was younger than the 21 year old Hayley Mills while playing the doting daughter(s) roles, Durbin looks much older, as in adult.
American stars appear in the leading roles, talking with fake accents and emphasizing old stereotypes and patriarchal ideology.
Out of all the actors involved in this mess, only Paul Giamatti and Rachel Weisz brings some life to there perspective paper thin
roles
and that's manly because they are both way too good of actors to be in this film.
Surely this guy knows acting, what he doesn't know is better way of choosing
roles.
She has had better
roles.
It so happens in Hollywood that even the biggest stars fall down on their knees and pick up low class
roles
as Jody Foster did in this movie.
I'm a huge fan of the Cusacks, this being the sole reason I watched this movie, but the only reason I can see for their presence was the reprise, in complete and depth less quality, their exact
roles
from Grosse Point Blanc.
He is, however, not a person who can carry a movie in dueling
roles
no less.
The actors and actresses were horrible and it seemed like they were trying way too hard to play their
roles
as dorks, tough guys, jerks, know it alls, etc.
I was watching the movie with high expectations (though i knew it was a flop), especially as the film has superstar Amitabh Bachchan playing the role of a villain.I though at least actors like him would have done some worth to their roles.But unfortunately Mr Bachchan failed to impress as villain this proved that nobody can compete AMJAD KHAN's magic Rgv's trial to re-kindle the past backfired royally!
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Actors
Movie
Other
Supporting
Played
Great
There
Would
Playing
Really
Women
Which
Acting
Could
About
Characters
Character
Actor
Better