Example collocations logo

Reviewed in sentence

184 examples of Reviewed in a sentence

Apparently, most people who have reviewed "The Touch of Satan" here only saw the "MST3K" version, as the original version is too crappy to watch.
One of them (I can't remember which)favorably reviewed it as one their undiscovered gems.
i've never reviewed a movie before, but i just wanted to try and share my feelings with all of you.
Frankly, I don't understand the people who reviewed this film as terrible.
The script for Slap Shot 2-Breaking the Ice should have been thoroughly reviewed over and over with a fine-tooth comb before they started filming.
The people who reviewed this movie and said they liked the effects and the props were clueless.
Yep, here it is.. the worst movie I've ever reviewed on this site.
I have reviewed quite a few films over the years by teams like the Marx Brothers, Olsen and Johnson, Wheeler and Woolsey, Abbott and Costello as well as the Three Stooges (all contemporaries of the Ritz's) and can say that for me, they are by far the least talented team of the era.
When I first reviewed this movie on my website, I was very harsh regarding the acting.
This film was reviewed as a british gangster film which it isn't.
This is the first time, the VERY FIRST TIME, I've ever, EVER, given a movie I've reviewed here a 1. Hopefully, it won't be the last.
I have watched A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving for many years and of all the Peanuts specials that I have watched and reviewed for this website, this is my favorite.
I see no one has reviewed this flick here since 2007.
I don't have much to add to what has already been reviewed, except that this movie is "The One" ;-) A heck of a potboiler of a movie, with a touch of class!
So immediately upon my return, I googled Bret Easton Ellis pics and reviewed many photos.
as is typical of reviews of most films at IMDb, 20% or so find films reviewed here as being bad.
Like everyone that has reviewed this film before me, I am going to sing it's praises, however, unlike those before me, I'm not quite sure why.
I one reviewed a movie on IMDb and said it was the worst I had ever seen, but this movie has superseded that one to become the worst.
The level of professionalism is ratcheted up to something akin to 60 Minutes over, say, typical documentary fare like Hidden in Plain Sight, which I have reviewed.
I can remember that when it came out, a film magazine reviewed it twice, feeling that it had to do so, since its two reviewers had such contrasting opinions.
I'm pretty sure, many who reviewed this movie here, have used this summary line.
I've reviewed several exploitation flicks (most of which were all produced on 'shoe-string' budgets) and have found that most, if not all, of them have some form of redeeming feature.
The film reviewed here by the other reviewer is actually "Orgasmo", which was released in the US in 1969 as "Paranoia".
This particular "Paranoia", the one reviewed here, was actually released here in the US as "A Quiet Place to Kill".
In the end, my problem is not so much this unremarkable movie (it varies little from several other movies of the 40s and 50s about the dangers of radioactivity) but about where the people who reviewed this movie as "scientifically accurate" are getting their information.
Reviewed at its 3rd & final screening Sat.
He should have taken his time and reviewed the script.
I previously reviewed Jet Pilot, another John Wayne film done for RKO in the mid-1950s.
Medvedev’s announcement one day after Putin’s election on March 5 that the Khodorkovsky case will be reviewed is a hopeful start.
Global nuclear safety standards are being reviewed.
Back