Example collocations logo

Regulatory in sentence

1413 examples of Regulatory in a sentence

The ECB was not given overall supervisory and regulatory powers.
An efficient supply-side response to this large and growing source of demand requires regulatory reform in many services, including finance, product safety, transport, and logistics.
Unfortunately, the medical community is resisting the use of pharmacogenomic data in clinical practice, despite regulatory authorities’ recommendations for many drugs.
This reform should be packaged with a careful evaluation of the regulatory climate for business, designed to eliminate or streamline the rules.
Time and again, financial crises have reflected the weaknesses of regulatory systems founded on the lessons learned from previous crises.
Until the financial reforms adopted since the crisis, this “shadow” banking system operated outside the regulatory regime that applied to traditional deposit-taking banks.
Only Rajasthan's economy has kept pace with the rest of the country; the other four have not benefited much from trade and regulatory liberalization.
The regulatory hybrid securities would have all the advantages of debt in normal times.
The regulatory hybrid securities are thus designed to deal with the very source of systemic instability that the current crisis highlighted.
The proposal also specifies a distinct role for the government in encouraging the issuance of regulatory hybrid securities, because banks would not issue them otherwise.
Its member organizations are the G-20’s central banks and top regulatory agencies.
Successfully concluding the regulatory reform initiatives currently under way is the first imperative.
Many services remain inefficient, because they are either in the domain of an archaic public administration or enjoy monopoly rents created by regulatory barriers.
Leaving aside the hypocrisy of Western governments pontificating on this topic while they are bailing out banks after massive regulatory failures, the proposal is seriously flawed.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration has pushed through two important regulatory changes that could free up billions of dollars in private capital for social-impact investing, including pay-for-success schemes.
When policy is required but the science is unclear, regulatory decisions are increasingly based on the “precautionary principle,” which is designed to prevent situations in which serious harm could occur.
In its regulatory processes, science-based arguments are increasingly losing out to public opinion, while possible opportunities are undervalued.
Given this regulatory environment, chief executives of 12 companies (including BASF), with a combined annual research-and-development budget of €21 billion ($28 billion), recently proposed the formal adoption of an “innovation principle” in European risk management and regulatory practice.
A regulatory regime that gave unfair advantages to local businesses would hurt consumers, hamper innovation, and damage competitiveness.
German and French pressure has led to calls for beefed-up regulatory powers to rein in powerful, usually American platforms, such as Google and Facebook.
Early criticism came from France, which vigorously objected to the 2004 and 2006 editions’ endorsement of the “legal origins” theory, which suggests that common-law countries benefit from greater regulatory efficiency than civil-law countries.
Others criticize the report’s methodology, claiming that the indicators are not inclusive or that they improperly measure countries’ regulatory environments.
Over the medium term, according to Wolf, countries need to put in place regulatory measures that lower debt levels and discourage overleveraging.
Strict uniformity of regulatory practices may not be necessary.
Like them, it must develop regulatory approaches that offset the banking system’s bias toward excessive real-estate finance.
Imitation and adaptation will also be critical here, as will sound regulatory and competitive policies.
So it is unfortunate that America abandoned the Kyoto process for combating global warming, instead of trying to move that process toward sensible market-based solutions and away from the regulatory mechanism beloved of bureaucrats everywhere.
It explains why British businesses are increasingly appalled by the prospect that the UK government will not deliver continuing post-Brexit regulatory alignment with the EU.
The cost of their regulatory burden is a fee they pay for market power.
The FCA is proposing to make its regulatory sandbox method global.
BackNext