Regulatory
in sentence
1413 examples of Regulatory in a sentence
In fact, it works pretty well, though mistakes do occur (as they do in any
regulatory
system).
Most important, this multiple agency structure ensures
regulatory
competition - each agency generally wants to expand its domain of chartering and jurisdiction - that is generally beneficial for the financial system and for the health of the American economy.
I am not arguing for the world to replicate the American system of 200-plus
regulatory
agencies.
As such frameworks brought about
regulatory
convergence, the US and the EU would be able to define the standards of the emerging new global economy, forcing China either to accept those standards or be left behind.
Europeans recognized that full
regulatory
convergence between the US and the EU would, in reality, take at least a decade.
Indeed,
regulatory
issues are still cited as a serious deterrent to investment.
If, on the other hand, we believe that economic actors will respond rationally to incentives and information, then we can usefully reform
regulatory
frameworks with well-targeted measures, including restrictions on off-balance sheet vehicles, tougher disclosure requirements, and controls on rating agencies’ conflicts of interests.
Such progress will demand, among other things, vastly improved accounting and reporting, together with smart
regulatory
reforms.
With the financial crisis worsening, the London summit in 2009 agreed to unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus and backed a stronger, more coherent
regulatory
and supervisory framework worldwide.
Its successors are radically different in how they work, as is the
regulatory
framework, which sets astonishing new benchmarks for the care and quality required at every stage of the process.
They help workers and companies alike to tackle labor-market challenges, while meeting demand for flexibility (an important potential catalyst for both companies and workers) – that is, if certain structural and
regulatory
requirements are implemented.
And, while
regulatory
reform is progressing, its effectiveness in addressing the weaknesses exposed by the global financial crisis will depend not only on the new rules that emerge, but also on the consistency and quality of their implementation.
Likewise, the impact of
regulatory
changes resulting from major legislation and policy directives in the United States, Europe, and the United Kingdom on banking, insurance, financial-transaction taxes, anti-money laundering, and cyber-space is likely to be substantial.
In the coming years, emerging markets will most likely struggle with implementation of global financial
regulatory
standards, which apply mostly to more sophisticated financial markets.
Indeed, perhaps the most important lesson learned in the aftermath of the collapse of Lehman Brothers is that we can no longer afford to examine problems in terms of individual institutions and from
regulatory
“silos.”
Disappointment about the raters’ performance, and skepticism about the effectiveness of regulation, has led to calls to eliminate any
regulatory
reliance on ratings.
Under the Senate’s approach, regulators would create rules under which an independent
regulatory
board would choose raters.
As the crisis that began in 2008 has shown, there are too many, rather than too few, supervisory and
regulatory
institutions overseeing European financial markets – almost 70 in the EU as a whole.
The new
regulatory
model also fails to address a persistent weakness of the single European financial market: how to pay the costs (or “share the burden”) when a multinational bank fails.
In short, there is no
regulatory
system that I trust more than the current messy world of conflicting interests.
According to the OECD, lower
regulatory
costs and more efficient public administration (building upon measures introduced by the previous government, led by Mario Monti) could add 0.3-0.4% to average annual GDP growth by 2020.
After deliberating for more than three years, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last month issued a final rule that will allow true crowdfunding; and yet the new
regulatory
framework still falls far short of what’s needed to boost crowdfunding worldwide.
That’s why channeling dispersed knowledge into new businesses requires a
regulatory
framework that favors the genuinely enlightened and honest.
The global trading order of the last generation – since the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995 – has been predicated on the assumption that
regulatory
regimes around the world would converge.
So pressure outside the US and Britain to put the hedge fund industry on a tighter
regulatory
leash is hardly surprising.
Elsewhere (the US), the losses were covered up with a great deal of
regulatory
“forbearance” (i.e., agreeing to look the other way while banks rebuild their capital by trading securities).
Ideally – from their point of view – they will bulk up without attracting
regulatory
scrutiny, i.e., no ex ante limits on their risk-taking activities will be imposed.
While 37 states have some form of enabling legislation and
regulatory
framework for infrastructure PPPs, there are wide disparities among states.
Investments in tomorrow’s energy supply and production processes will largely come from the private sector; but it is up to government to develop the institutional and
regulatory
frameworks that ensure that these investments are allocated in ways that are environmentally sustainable.
One element that central banks and regulators frequently mention is a new
regulatory
regime: the crisis revealed that institutional and
regulatory
frameworks in the EBRD region need to be reformed to introduce macro-prudential standards more systematically and effectively.
Back
Next
Related words
Financial
Their
Framework
Which
Global
Would
Banks
System
Should
Countries
Market
Government
Investment
Markets
Agencies
Other
Policies
Policy
While
Standards