Example collocations logo

Regimes in sentence

1100 examples of Regimes in a sentence

Discredited regimes may cling all the more ruthlessly and ruinously to power, as in Syria.
With the exception of the Obama administration’s lack of resolve in denouncing the treatment of protesters by the US-allied regimes in Bahrain and Yemen, America’s position on the Arab revolts has been welcomed.
A more positive view of Obama emerged when the Arab revolts began in Tunisia and Egypt –countries with pro-US regimes.
Arab youth had finally moved, and Obama and his team made the right statements to encourage them, while also making it clear to the Egyptian and Tunisian regimes that they could no longer hide behind the claim that they were fighting America’s war in north Africa.
But Assad’s coalition is broader than that, which helps to explain how he has been able to hold on to power while other regimes in the region have not.
Moreover, the traditional interpretation of the Bank’s Articles of Agreement imposed a proclaimed “neutrality” that translated into a readiness to overlook the nature of its client countries’ regimes and their lack of popular accountability.
So it is, in a way, and in the hands of authoritarian regimes, genetic selection could resemble the evils of earlier forms of eugenics, with their advocacy of odious, pseudoscientific official policies, particularly concerning “racial hygiene.”
Chile, which for political reasons has always wanted to bring together the more liberal economies of the Pacific with the more protectionist regimes of the Atlantic, would have plenty of reasons to help move the process forward.
As a result, exchange-rate depreciation could mitigate the fallout for growth, particularly in countries with credible inflation-targeting regimes.
Fascist and communist regimes of the past, which followed a similar instrumentalist approach to democracy, come to mind here.
Indeed, Bin Laden’s death should open the international community’s eyes to the source of his movement: repressive Arab regimes and their extremist ideologies.
But during the Cold War, authoritarian capitalism, usually under military regimes, was anti-Communist and very much on America’s side.
The way that illiberal regimes use the law for their own ends will not inspire the confidence of investors, either – at least not in the long run.
Western businessmen, artists, architects, and others who need large amounts of money for expensive projects enjoy working with authoritarian regimes that “get things done.”
WWI ended four imperial regimes: the Prussian (Hohenzollern) dynasty, the Russian (Romanov) dynasty, the Turkish (Ottoman) dynasty, and the Austro-Hungarian (Habsburg) dynasty.
More democratic regimes were, consequently, rather suspicious of the political implications of institutional innovation.
The signal being sent is clear: it is preferable that Israel, the only state in the region that abides by the rule of law, be surrounded by authoritarian regimes where political outcomes are predictable than by democratic states where Islamists may well rise to power.
But the credibility of all democratic regimes, not just India’s, is at stake in what unfolds in Myanmar.
Likewise, China’s relations with authoritarian regimes, or even its responsibility for preserving the global environment, are rarely mentioned.
Experience shows that democracies hold the edge over authoritarian regimes when it comes to handling the fallout from crises.
Authoritarian regimes lack the institutions of conflict management that democracies provide.
During the immediate postwar occupation, US military planners had to impose new currency regimes and central banking institutions.
A state can threaten death, but, as many totalitarian regimes have learned, no one is stronger - and possibly more dangerous - than those who have overcome the fear of death.
He notes that our political regimes have long stopped functioning like liberal democracies and increasingly look like undemocratic liberalism.
The depth and alignment of these divisions determine the likelihood of various political regimes.
It wanted to be exemplary, not just joining multilateral regimes and organizations, but also making its own contribution.
More fundamentally, governments in oil-producing countries are confronting a political dilemma: Stronger economic growth, though desirable, requires regimes to take risks that could endanger their very survival.
Some regimes will be tempted to stick with the status quo, hope for a recovery in oil prices, and crack down harder on civil society in the meantime.
The CIA was created in 1947 with two mandates, one valid (intelligence gathering) and the other disastrous (covert operations to overthrow regimes deemed “hostile” to US interests).
Many of the elected Islamist regimes will fail, as many poorly performing governments do.
BackNext