Regime
in sentence
4002 examples of Regime in a sentence
In this emotional and gripping movie Rithy Panh confronts former killers and the few survivors (among the thousands of inmates) of the slaughtering in the horrible S-21 prison in Phnom Penh during the Red Khmer
regime
in Kampuchea.
Stories taking place during the Nazi
regime
and WW2, especially when made by Germans, sometimes tend to be ultra-politically-correct. But, surprise, surprise.
One has to have lived in a Socialist country (as I did) to fully understand the situation of the Georgian people (or any other country previously ruled by a Socialist regime.)
This movie for me was a real eye opener, not only in regards to the treatment of people under the rule of a military regime, but life in general in Afghanistan.
Both find gratification not of the kind generally permissible under Dr. Kellogg's
regime.
The
regime
is sexually repressive yet one finds sexual tension relieved at every turn.
It's an obvious tribute to novels like "1984", and while not as well executed as that novel, there is something to be said for the startling visuals presented on such a low budget that bring to life the horrors of a totalitarian
regime.
After WWII, under Stalin's regime, Russia invites all defectors back to their homeland, but it is a trick.
Indeed, trough a story of a student who tries to make a graduation film Wajda beautifully succeeds in describing at the same time the soft violence of the '70s in Poland and the totally different hardcore 'prison' violence of the Stalinist
regime
in the 50's.
It would either force the
regime
back to the negotiating table with a genuine intention of reaching a settlement, or at least make it clear that Assad will not have a free hand in re-establishing his rule.
Appeasement toward the authoritarian
regime
in Russia can apparently be bought.
As for Freud, he was driven into exile by the Hitler
regime.
Austria's past calls for an intensely critical and sensitive approach to injustice, murder, and terror under the Nazi
regime.
To expedite matters, I have appointed a special representative for the question of forced and slave labor under the Nazi
regime.
But the measures recommended here would serve to build a more decentralized, incentive-based policy
regime.
Clearly, an autocratic
regime
is more favorable to the rapid accumulation of capital than a democratic one, and a prosperous country is more favorable to the development of democratic institutions than a destitute one.
The purpose of Trump’s move is clear and indeed explicit: to topple the Iranian
regime.
America’s previous efforts at
regime
change in the Middle East yielded horrendous results for the US and Europe (to say nothing of the disasters that befell the countries caught up in the US-provoked mayhem).
Even when
regime
change has “succeeded,” as in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, the aftermath has been violence and instability.
And when
regime
change has failed, as in Syria, the result has been ongoing war.
The “anything is possible” sensation of the Tahrir Square rebellion had faded, and now two candidates whom the protesters deeply opposed, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi, and Ahmed Shafiq, a factotum of the old
regime
(and of the current military government), prepared to face off in the second round.
The secular liberal forces’ political fragmentation and lack of organization cost them dearly in the parliamentary elections six months ago, and, in the second round of the presidential election, a majority of Egyptians chose Morsi over a restoration of the old
regime.
Others do not believe that the Muslim Brotherhood will go so far, but nonetheless doubt that the Brothers will defend a secular, truly democratic
regime
in the ongoing negotiations with SCAF on a transition to civilian rule.
Only this will give a Morsi administration the necessary legitimacy and capacity to carry out a joint transition with the military for a true change of
regime.
Iran has provided substantial support to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, while Turkey has advocated military intervention on behalf of opposition forces.
How will Israel address intensifying global opposition to the de facto apartheid
regime
implied by denying Palestinians throughout Israel and Palestine the same political rights as Israeli Jews?
Yet there is much more that EU leaders can do to undermine the
regime
economically.
This is difficult to reconcile with lending to a country like Iran, which publicly executes individuals for sexual “deviance,” imprisons women who protest peacefully, and silences journalists who are critical of the
regime.
Individual companies, mindful of US sanctions on those who do business with the regime, can also help.
True, not all members of the thinking minority attend the dissenters’ marches, yet many more of them silently oppose the
regime.
Back
Next
Related words
Change
Which
Would
Their
Against
Political
Country
Military
International
Could
Economic
Nuclear
After
Under
Government
Should
Sanctions
Power
People
Countries