Example collocations logo

Reforms in sentence

4494 examples of Reforms in a sentence

These sweeping institutional reforms would make China’s governance structure look functionally similar to American and European counterparts.
Financial reforms are in the hands of People’s Bank of China Governor Yi Gang, a US-educated economist, and the chairman of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, Guo Shuqing, an Oxford-trained economist with experience in provincial leadership, central banking, and securities regulation.
Xi is certainly not finished yet, having outlined a set of legal reforms at last month’s Fourth Plenum of the Communist Party aimed at creating a more level playing field for the public and private sectors.
If implemented properly, the reforms will create a more efficient system for the creation and enforcement of contracts, ease the path for market entrants, and strengthen the application of China’s competition laws.
Individual countries would still need to undertake structural reforms.
But Germany’s acceptance of Eurobonds would transform the atmosphere and facilitate the needed reforms.
Lagging countries that fail to promote gender equality, invest in education, and adopt broader governance and regulatory reforms risk falling even further behind in reaping the significant benefits of globalization.
Since coming to power by force more than 30 years ago, he has cooperated with the West’s War on Terror, and championed the neoliberal economic reforms pushed by the World Bank.
For decades the Socialists and the parties of the right, now grouped in Les Républicains, have failed to deliver the economic reforms – and thus the economic growth – that France badly needs.
Some future MPs from the two traditional parties, as well as others, will almost certainly buck their own party leaders to vote for Macron’s planned reforms.
The first two major reforms that his government will seek to implement entail an overhaul of the labor market and a tightening of rules on ethics in the public sector.
If our agriculture sector is to survive, we must follow through on sweeping reforms, including to our agricultural cooperatives, which have not changed in 60 years.
We are determined to press ahead with the structural reforms needed to succeed.
Rather than continue fighting (as in the US) after a heated presidential election, Mexico’s major political parties appear poised to cooperate on a number of critical structural reforms that could energize economic growth for decades to come.
First and foremost, the political elite might suddenly back away from essential structural reforms, and the Mexican business community’s current optimism could collapse.
Indeed, his broadside may effectively kill some of the reforms, currently being discussed at the EU Convention, which aim to streamline decision-making within the EU by creating institutions that would, in effect, give more power to countries with bigger populations.
Such reforms can work only if the big member states do not succumb to the temptation to use these mechanisms to bypass or ride roughshod over the interests of the small countries.
Slowly but surely, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel – the bloc’s two most powerful leaders – have shown signs of coming together to pursue long-overdue EU-level reforms.
Owing to the lingering effects of the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent eurozone crisis, the EU has failed to implement necessary reforms.
The recently approved reforms already require changes to the IMF’s “Articles of Agreement.”
Reforms are needed if Europe really wants to become a competitive, knowledge-based economy, and not merely the most regulated one.
But countries with less generous oil endowments need to implement economic reforms and eliminate subsidies.
It is time for Europe’s leaders to break the decades-old habit of pursuing half-baked projects that blunt the symptoms of crises, and to implement real reforms that address the root causes.
Since the 1990s, it has not invested sufficiently in human capital to meet the fast-changing economy’s shifting skill requirements; undertaken no effective education, environmental, or labor-market reforms; and launched no new urban initiatives or future-proofing infrastructure policies.
In the US, the federal government does not take responsibility for solving states’ individual problems; indeed, the states that have been hardest hit by the crisis have undertaken their own reforms.
What is certain is that delaying much-needed reforms would be more than risky; it would spell disaster for the eurozone.
Despite the chorus of voices condemning austerity, labor-market flexibility, and so on, there is a reasonable chance that these are the reforms that will be pursued.
The problem countries in the EU have been moving in this direction, and their reforms’ success is largely proportionate to the speed with which they have been introduced.
The examples of Poland, Estonia, Sweden, and Germany, among others, demonstrate that early reforms can yield huge social payoffs.
Indeed, creating a regulatory agency is often a crucial component of successful telecommunications reforms, which typically start by privatizing the state-owned monopoly telecom company.
BackNext