Reforms
in sentence
4494 examples of Reforms in a sentence
These two Mexicos are pulling in opposite directions, which explains why three decades of
reforms
to open markets, privatize industries, embrace free trade, and welcome foreign investment have failed to raise growth rates.
Despite recent labor-market reforms, limitations on layoffs and temporary workers continue to encourage even large companies to hire full-time workers through third-party agencies (and thereby avoid burdensome restrictions).
But Europe should have learned from its lackluster response to the financial crisis that postponing essential but painful
reforms
only leads to more dramatic and complex political crises down the road.
Just as an athlete might use steroids to get quick results, while avoiding the tough workouts that are needed to develop endurance and ensure long-term health, some emerging economies have relied on short-term capital inflows (so-called “hot money”) to support growth, while delaying or even avoiding difficult but necessary economic and financial
reforms.
This scenario has the potential to disrupt growth in those emerging economies that have failed to take advantage of the recent capital inflows by pursuing
reforms.
Indeed, more than three-fifths of developing countries – many of which are strong economic performers that benefited from pre-crisis
reforms
(and thus attracted more stable capital inflows like foreign-direct investment) – actually appreciated last spring and summer.
Although leaders at a recent African Economic Conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, committed to keeping governance
reforms
at the top of Africa’s agenda, they offered no blueprint.
The first set of
reforms
would involve establishing clear lines of sovereignty with international partners.
Along the same lines, the second set of
reforms
pertains to prioritizing economic rights over political rights.
Forcing leaders to step down in the middle of economic
reforms
seems counterproductive.
Drawing lessons from
reforms
in Afghanistan and their experience in Haiti, Belt, Kashi, and Mackinnon suggest changing the power sector’s institutional and regulatory framework, corporatizing the EDH, and establishing cost-reflective tariffs.
Many of the governance
reforms
proposed for the IMF and the World Bank – affecting, most obviously, how their heads are chosen – finally seem to be on the table.
Such
reforms
will not occur overnight.
Postponing the exit after the June election with a new government committed to a variant of the same failed policies (recessionary austerity and structural reforms) will not restore growth and competitiveness.
A rapid reduction in unit labor costs, through structural
reforms
that increased productivity growth in excess of wages, is just as unlikely.
Reforms
have been renewed in recent years – now under the heading of “los lineamientos,” or the “guidelines.”
China, beginning with Deng Xiaoping’s reforms, is the obvious choice – that is, if soaring income inequality is not as important as maintaining Communist Party control and ensuring that Cuba’s leaders never have to admit that their official ideology has expired.
Meanwhile, India’s growth rate has plunged as a result of faltering economic
reforms
and unsustainable budgetary choices: it now has record-high fiscal and current-account deficits.
At the recent annual meeting of central bankers in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde expressed concern about slowing growth in emerging markets and urged them to pursue additional economic
reforms.
Emerging from a series of macroeconomic crises in the mid-1990s, Mexico undertook bold
reforms
that should have put it on track for rapid economic growth.
In many respects, these
reforms
paid off.
What is striking is that this dualism has worsened during the period of Mexico’s liberalizing
reforms.
The beneficiaries of globalization are typically those countries that complemented it with a strategy to promote new activities, policies that favored the real economy over finance, and sequential
reforms
that emphasized high-productivity employment.
In the end, the effects of efficiency-minded
reforms
have been offset by factors – social insurance policies and market imperfections – that systematically channel too many resources to informal firms and create obstacles to formal firms.
These
reforms
work, typically in conjunction with others, when they promote productivity-enhancing structural transformation.
Rather, they require targeted, country-specific
reforms
that remove actual obstacles to the expansion of modern sectors, and social policies that are compatible with structural transformation.
With the recent return of growth and abatement of migratory pressure, European leaders are now exploring options for EU- and eurozone-level
reforms.
Rock-bottom borrowing costs also spur excessive reliance on leverage, weakening the will to undertake
reforms
needed to boost potential growth – and further exacerbating the economy’s vulnerability to a shift in interest rates or investor sentiment.
Generally, those that have fared better, such as India, have combined sound growth fundamentals and
reforms
with pragmatic and activist measures to counter the external sources of volatility.
The State Council has also been restructured, with ministries, commissions, and agencies consolidated and streamlined to manage
reforms
in a more coordinated and efficient way.
Back
Next
Related words
Structural
Economic
Growth
Would
Political
Countries
Government
Their
Which
Needed
Fiscal
Economy
Implement
Financial
Should
While
Country
Policy
Other
Market