Example collocations logo

Readers in sentence

378 examples of Readers in a sentence

It can hardly be compared to a British 'La Haine' because, unlike La Haine it is so lacking in aesthetic material, i.e. inspired cinematography, gritty realism, and a portrayal of philosophic ideas that it comes across more as a day time soap such as 'Doctors' (as British readers will agree).
I noted there are many votes, most of them from England, giving ten stars to this film and misleading readers like me.
The many efforts to recreate Jane Eyre for TV or Cinema attest to the ongoing satisfaction readers have with this author and this book.
Watching it a second time, readers will realise that while most of the action in India is true to the book, it picks events almost at random from Sharpe's Tiger, Sharpe's Triumph and Sharpe's Fortress (the three books set in India), while simultaneously moving them from the period of 1799-1803 to 1817.
Regular readers of my review list will already know that I am a great fan of the slasher genre.
What ended it was not anger at and rejection of this installment by Fangoria readers and horror fans in general, but instead the company's own disinterest in continuing it.
I'm sure it was fascinating for readers of the stories to watch our hero develop, and there have since been countless literary expositions on Holmes and anything accompanying him.
I mention this in the hope that this will encourage readers to view the film.
Adapting a novel with complex elements and undertones to the silver screen is a daunting task and director Robert Schwentke struggled to compromise between satisfying readers of the novel and making the movie accessible to people unfamiliar with the book.
I have alerted readers to spoilers, but the truth is there is so little action, story line, character development or writing, there isn't much to spoil.
Its like America's Funniest Home Video's for The New Yorker readers.
More than anything, the readers were phenomenal.
The readers brought those ex-slaves' voices to life.
While traditional media can present their readers with balanced coverage, digital media can fuel political polarization.
The challenge that business considerations pose to journalism – both news and commentary providers – takes the form of three separate temptations: to slant the news to please readers rather than inform them, and thus attract advertisers; to slant the news to please advertisers directly; and to slant the news to advance owners’ political or commercial interests.
The paper’s duty will remain to its readers and not to the private interests of its owners.
The assumption is that if news outlets were to report only the “facts,” readers and viewers would always reach the right conclusion about a given story.
The best chance truth has is if writers and authors persist in presenting readers with facts; every now and then, we are rewarded for these efforts.
By sheer luck, I was among the earliest readers of the English-language version of Capital in the Twenty-First Century.
Many readers know how money-market funds work: An investor buys a $1.00 share from the XYZ fund, which keeps each share’s value at a constant $1.00, allowing the investor to believe that the money – invested in a pool of safe, secure, but not always government-guaranteed assets – is on deposit.
His readers then had to wait another 27 years for his second book, On What Matters, unless they were able to read one of the drafts that Parfit circulated in order to receive suggestions for improvement.
Some media organizations continue to provide high-quality journalism, but they have nowhere near as many readers or viewers as the leading state-controlled media.
The climate-change “Baptists” provide the moral cover that politicians can use to sell regulation, along with scary stories that the media can use to attract readers or viewers.
(Perhaps some readers can even pick up clues on when the Fed will raise rates!)
Under existing copyright restrictions, titles accessible in the richest countries remain inaccessible to readers in the poorest.
Berkeleyside, in Berkeley, California, recently raised $1 million from its readers through a direct public offering.
But, as the British newspaper The Guardian assured readers, this was a breakthrough, because developing countries, including India and China, were, for the first time, “agreeing to be legally bound to curb their greenhouse gases.”
That idea of an ethical approach to the Greek crisis might sound absurd to readers of the financial press, and many politicians will undoubtedly consider it naive.
But, whereas many rushed to see Klimov’s film, Alexievich’s book did not seem to excite readers.
While this brutally matter-of-fact tone can make readers uneasy (indeed, it was one reason why I took so long to read the book), we cannot afford to be ignorant of the truth, even – or perhaps especially – if it makes us squirm.
BackNext