Ratings in sentence

583 examples of Ratings in a sentence

Judging by his ratings, it seems as though even the left is bored with this nonsense.

Judging by the user ratings, which generally seem to me to reflect a very young taste, this movie should have an age warning.

The same formula, an Alan Alda type hero, a sex interested for ratings, a stupid Frank Burns right wing guy who does something stupid and gets killed, and as always CIA plot, everyone has to be good looking, idealistic, and all the world's problems simply can be blamed on the US and the government they support etc etc etc... Nothing new here, they even try to do the Vietnam flashback imagery, with that same Stones song used in everyone of these movies.

It seems that people watch this movie only to give it a below par ratings.

this zombie movie was just corny,and made no sense.It was also so slow the jokes were just hours long and the dialogue was cut and so slow this was one of the worst movies i have ever seen by far.Mostly I never read ratings and decide if the movie is bad or not on my own but this was one of those cases when you should.There's bad and there's horribly stupid disgusting waist of time and this is past that.The makeup was horrible and was more of a porno then a zombie movie,The acting was the worst i have ever seen, a 5 year old could do better.Wow I'm still disgusted on how horribly bad this movie is blah!blah!blah!

Maybe Adrian is great on Entourage, but I don't see why this movie itself isn't getting worse star ratings.

A good example on how you can't trust the ratings on this site

But still goes strong placing in the top ten of TV ratings about each and every year!

The Coneheads did not open to overly positive ratings, and it's not surprising it didn't.

During its inauspicious four year run, the TV series "Starsky & Hutch" was never a huge hit; though it did land at an impressive number 15 in the Nielsen ratings its first year (1975-76), the numbers declined steadily thereafter.

There are a lot of things that astonish and disappoint me in this world...but this ridiculous piece of garbage film getting a 5.9 rating on the back of a LOT of perfect ratings is one of the most disappointing and disturbing of all.

I don't know what the ratings are like but the only thing worst than this show are probably the commercials.

I used to catch all the made-for-TV horror/thriller stuff in the 70's, because there were no VCR's or DVD players & this was all there was (well, except for movies at the theater, most of which I couldn't go see because of the ratings and because I was too young to have money to go see them).

What's that with the low ratings?

I normally don't like to give low ratings to art-house films set in Europe with a strong cast.

I didn't really think it was a 10, but I rated it as such because I felt all the other ratings were too low.

Also i feel as though the show cared more about the ratings and the number of viewers then they cared about the viewers that this would upset.

I only regret that they don't allow negative ratings on here.

So, to make a final verdict, a pretty pointless affair with the following ratings: segment 1: 3/10 segment 2: 5/10

I don't know why this film has such low ratings.

I will give it a 6 out of 10 stars, but its still very good, so don't take the low ratings and don't rent it, its worth it.

I read the reviews of this film and noticed it was receiving good ratings so I decided to see it, result, don't believe everything your hear(or read).

I just watched this movie on the The Movie Channel about an hour ago, and frankly, I must say that I am shocked to see that the 18 people who voted for it here averaged a 7.0 in their ratings of it.

I can't believe that "Kingpin" is getting thumped in the ratings by the usual sludge that nets like Fox dumb us down with every night.

Since NBC owns Bravo now, maybe they'll continue new eps. of "Kingpin" on Bravo next season if the ratings merit it.

I actually enjoyed this quite a bit, but I am giving it a 1, because I cannot believe that it deserves an 8.8, which is what it is getting this evening, mostly apparently due to suspicious ratings from countries like Slovakia, India and Australia.

I'm not saying that IMDb's ratings are being manipulated by some sort of conspiracy, I am just saying it is odd.

What was NOT surprising was that all the viewer's ratings for this film was distributed extremely skewed, at both poles.

I mean, the underdog story was quite far-fetched and there were several elements to make it laughable (the music video-like sequences scattered through the more motivational sequences in the film), but it is it really deserving of such poor ratings?

I guess that is why I like ratings by actual viewers!

Related words