Radical
in sentence
1428 examples of Radical in a sentence
Overall, a
radical
Trump would significantly increase the US budget deficit.
A
radical
Trump would also drastically change the current monetary-policy approach – first by replacing US Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen with a monetarist hawk, and then by filling current and upcoming Fed Board vacancies with more of the same.
Finally, a
radical
Trump’s foreign policy would destabilize America’s alliances and escalate tensions with rivals.
Meanwhile, the Democratic minority in the Senate will be able to filibuster any
radical
reforms that Trump proposes, especially if they touch the third rail of American politics: Social Security and Medicare.
If he tries to pursue
radical
populist policies, the response will be swift and punishing: stocks will plummet, the dollar will fall, investors will flee to US Treasury bonds, gold prices will spike, and so forth.
The effects of a pragmatic Trump presidency would be far more limited than in the
radical
scenario.
A pragmatic Trump would still generate fiscal deficits, though smaller than in the
radical
scenario.
But it would be far more acceptable to investors – and the world – than the
radical
agenda he promised his voters.
At the least, Blair must press for a
radical
increase in funds provided by the outside world to the Palestinian government as well as to the 1.4 million Palestinians trapped in Hamas-run Gaza.
Instead of the intended
radical
realignment of power relations in the region, the aim is now to simply maintain the status quo.
True, the private sector will have much re-structuring to go through and the big deficits have been accumulated in the crisis must be unwound.This will mean a
radical
re-structuring of the state and its services.
Now a more
radical
possibility has been raised.
Taming India’s EliteNEW DELHI – It has been more than a year and a half since Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power on a promise to build a new India, one founded on a
radical
break with the past.
Just as a two-party system ensures stability and predictability, so might its collapse contribute to
radical
social change.
The AfD will take its place on the
radical
right as one party among many.
CAMBRIDGE – This year’s presidential campaign in the United States has been marked by calls from Barack Obama’s would-be Republican challengers for a
radical
transformation of American foreign policy.
This is what the more
radical
Euroskeptics in Britain think, having never shared the EU dream to begin with.
This
radical
expansion of executive power probably would not have withstood a legal challenge.
The question raised in October 2003 by then US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is no less relevant today: “Are we capturing, killing, or deterring and dissuading more terrorists every day than the madrassas and the
radical
clerics are recruiting, training, and deploying against us?”
Why are they attracted to
radical
ideas?
In Germany, radicalization takes place largely through
radical
mosque communities or private prayer rooms, as well as through the Internet.
The second question – why are some people attracted to
radical
ideas?
– has been explored by researchers and security practitioners, who generally agree that people are more inclined to accept
radical
ideologies if they feel alienated.
Lacking attractive social or professional prospects, such young people often seek a new and more welcoming home within a
radical
group.
It is everyone’s task to counter extremism actively and speak out about
radical
statements, in public and in private.
It is no wonder therefore, that a kind of survivalist chic has become the updated version of the radical, communal chic of the 1960’s.
But, while they and other
radical
Muslims around the world may hate Americans, it is hard to imagine a more Americanized, suburbanized immigrant subculture than Muslim immigrants in the US.
Rather then listening to
radical
clerics, they are busy assimilating, sending their kids to law and medical school, barbequing on weekends, and going to (American) football games – all while still maintaining devout ties to their religion and community.
If the US is serious about reaching a constructive outcome in Copenhagen, it must set
radical
and practical targets, take responsibility for its historic carbon emissions, and commit itself to support developing countries’ efforts by means of capacity building, technology transfer, and finance.
Third Plenums – and perhaps only Third Plenums – can bring about
radical
transformation.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Change
Would
Their
Political
Economic
Groups
World
There
Policy
Other
Reform
People
Government
Policies
About
Country
While
Public
Between