Example collocations logo

Racial in sentence

558 examples of Racial in a sentence

Add to that enduring income, racial, and gender inequality, and frustration with the current system is not surprising.
Palestinians are the only people of whom a majority sees less equality for people of different racial or ethnic groups, although opinion is relatively evenly divided in Nigeria, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Russia.
In Egypt, for example, 97% said that racial and ethnic equality is important, and 90% said that equality for women is important.
What is objectionable about hate speech, and makes it punishable by law in countries around the world, is that it is intended to incite discrimination or violence against members of a particular national, racial, ethnic, or religious group.
For the American President, the appointment of Supreme Court justices is of major importance because the Court has the power to determine the course of affairs in important respects, as in matters of racial equality.
Regardless of their economic, racial, or political differences, all Brazilians are uplifted by having the best team in the world, winning the World Cup many times, and inventing and reinventing “the beautiful game.”
Despite the racist and sexist messages that have been a staple of Fox News’s reporting and commentary since the network was launched in 1996, it took more than 20 lawsuits alleging racial and sexual discrimination to bring real recognition to the problem.
Since the revelations that Facebook and Twitter played a key role in disseminating false information and sowing mistrust and racial tension in the 2016 US election, a growing chorus has called for stricter regulations.
In the United States, they underpinned discrimination against immigrants and sustained the Jim Crow era of legal racial segregation.
A government that came to power promising to create national unity now seems disoriented in the face of the country’s deepening regional, racial, and economic divisions.
Just a few days earlier, in an incident that also drew significant media attention and condemnation, a spectator hurling racial abuse at a Sudanese-born player was escorted from the ground and banned from attending future matches unless he undertook racism-awareness education.
For a long time, however, there has been doubt in Australia about how much real across-the-board commitment there was to the underlying message that racial vilification anywhere, anytime, by anyone, in any context, is simply unacceptable.
According to a law that dates back to the French Revolution, and reconfirmed in 1978, French government officials are forbidden to collect information about a citizen’s ethnic or racial origins, whether real or alleged, when conducting a census or other efforts to gathering statistical information on the population.
Today, the issue has returned to the forefront because of a new fight against racial discrimination, which appears to require more accurate measures of social inequality.
Thus, there is a distinction between mentioning the original nationality, which is allowed, and mentioning ethnic and racial origins, which is not.
In view of the risk of inciting fresh antagonism, gathering racial, religious, and ethnic statistics may not be worth it.
The ban against ethnic and racial data is a taboo that should not be overthrown easily, and not without carefully weighing the risk to social peace.
Just as Lula’s 2002 election signified a sea of change in a highly class-conscious, socially stratified society, Silva’s election would shake up the racial order in a country – and indeed continent – where racism has not been eradicated.
Why do International Human Rights Conventions stipulate that the law should prohibit speech that supports national, racial, or religious hatred?
Obama’s example – and that of his newly formed cabinet, which includes many accomplished leaders from ethnic or racial “out-groups” – holds useful lessons for other nations, particularly in Western Europe.
But the world currently faces a growing technological divide, with implications for equality, liberty, and the right to pursue happiness that are no less momentous than the racial divide against which King preached.
What modernity more or less inevitably brings about is not secularization but pluralism – the peaceful co-existence of different racial, ethnic, or religious groups in the same society.
In late April, the European Parliament issued a report highlighting the danger that unrestricted data mining that relies on racial, ethnic, or national origin would subject innocent people to arbitrary stops, travel restrictions, and bans on employment or banking.
And it should make clear that police may not use ethnic, racial, or religious stereotypes.
This does not mean that local politics is easy; witness today’s fraught relations between police and racial minorities in US cities.
For more than a century, the government has promoted a policy of state-sponsored racial discrimination.
The discrimination by my country’s government against my racial and ethnic group is so blatant that some civil registry offices have distributed lists of “Haitian sounding names” so that staff members can recognize them.
As The Economist’s Jeremy Cliffe argued in a 2015 paper, factors like rising racial diversity, a more educated citizenry, urbanization, and increased variety in family structure seems to be giving rise to “an emerging cosmopolitan majority” in the UK.
For example, the Court ruled that the infamous “five techniques” – an early form of “enhanced interrogation” employed by the British in Northern Ireland in the 1970’s – constituted inhuman treatment, and condemned racial segregation of Roma children in Czech schools.
Teamed with that racial rage are religious and/or ideological fanaticisms.
Back