Example collocations logo

Psychiatrists in sentence

64 examples of Psychiatrists in a sentence

Some psychiatrists had reported that excessive use could lead to a psychotic state, including hallucinations, delusions, and thought disturbance.
But these apply rules that only replicate the way one or more psychiatrists interpret a patient's symptoms.
There is nothing absolute about the program's output, although it does at least do the same thing every time, which cannot be said for psychiatrists.
From the 1950's to 1980's, for example, psychoanalysis held sway among US psychiatrists.
During the 1970s, two international studies demonstrated that US psychiatrists diagnosed about twice as many patients as having schizophrenia as psychiatrists in other countries, where psychoanalytic training was relatively uncommon.
Moreover, how psychiatrists treat mental illness profoundly influences how it is defined.
Psychiatrists began altering their diagnoses to a condition for which they had an effective treatment.
International comparisons carried out by the World Health Organization show that as long as psychiatrists from different countries are trained to interview patients using a standardized format, they can agree on who is suffering from schizophrenia.
As well as scientists from the relevant disciplines, art theorists, psychiatrists, language experts and philosophers are beginning to participate in the discussion.
In the 1970’s and 1980’s, West German authorities allowed psychologists and psychiatrists to interview terrorism suspects then being held in prison or awaiting trial, including members of the Red Army Faction.
In these studies, neurologists, psychiatrists, geneticists, and behavioral researchers all contribute to realizing their common interest in discovering how the human brain operates.
The fact that Trump appears to have some mental disorder, or disorders, has created a dilemma for psychiatrists, politicians, and journalists alike.
But, given what some psychiatrists see as a national emergency, many have broken the rule and spoken or written publicly about their professional assessments of Trump’s mental state.
Another approach to determining Trump’s mental fitness would be to have psychiatrists examine him and share their findings.
But, however unbiased the psychiatrists were, such assessments would ultimately be subjective.
At his trial, two teams of court-appointed psychiatrists disagreed with each other over whether he was insane.
If psychiatrists can’t agree on whether a mass murderer is insane, what hope is there that they could agree about Trump?
Modern psychiatrists would argue that they have taken to heart the lessons of the Rosenhan experiment, and now make diagnoses much more cautiously and rigorously.
In the view of many professional psychologists and psychiatrists, Trump is not merely a bully, a showman, and a liar; he is more likely a mentally impaired individual who is impulsive, aggressive, and relentlessly driven to manipulate and blame others.
Political dissidents and others in similar categories brought before State forensic psychiatrists are often treated as the most “serious and dangerous” of all supposed mentally ill offenders, and face compulsory committal in these secretive institutions.
A powerful group of research psychiatrists was dissatisfied with the definitions of depression and other common mental disorders in the earlier, psychoanalytically-influenced diagnostic manuals.
The shooting in Newtown was not only especially horrific and heartbreaking, but is also part of an increasingly common pattern – a specific kind of murder-suicide that has been carefully studied by psychologists and psychiatrists.
The plan reportedly includes four of Uganda’s 11 registered psychiatrists, 20 of its 28 radiologists, and 15 of its 92 pediatricians.
Studies indicate that 40% of all patients fall short of the diagnoses that doctors and psychiatrists give them, yet 200 million prescriptions are still written annually in the US to treat depression and anxiety.
The updated manual advises psychiatrists and general practitioners that two weeks is an appropriate interval for grief.
Second, these are skilled interventions, delivered by practitioners with well defined and well regulated professional skills, who are either clinical psychologists or psychiatrists.
Besides the lawyers legitimating the deeds, psychologists, psychiatrists, doctors (whose presence was mandatory at any session), and scholars also regularly provided moral, legal, or philosophical justifications.
Although psychiatrists tend to worry more about identifying potential patients in need of help and less about eliminating normal eccentricity and distress from diagnosis, it is crucial in any society that respects human variation and encourages individual moral responsibility to distinguish normal suffering and eccentricity from mental disorder.
Yet the psychiatrists who formulated the DSM-5’s proposed changes are not trained in conceptual analysis, and, though amply forewarned, they have addressed the normal-versus-disordered issue in an unsystematic, ad hoc manner.
Not everybody with a mental illness needs expensive drugs, hospital care, or even direct access to highly trained psychiatrists.
Back