Example collocations logo

Protectionism in sentence

619 examples of Protectionism in a sentence

But there is a more compelling explanation: nobody will confront pervasive protectionism.
Contrary to populist arguments, protectionism will not reduce youth unemployment or income inequality.
In confronting this admittedly huge challenge, we need to avoid short-sighted responses, such as protectionism and other measures that stifle innovation.
The Trump administration is taking shape as a coalition of businesspeople who wrongly believe that protectionism is a good way to help the economy and market fundamentalists who now dominate the Republican caucus in the US House of Representatives.
Selling Trump’s signature issue – protectionism – to the House Republicans was not easy.
We now must ask what surging nationalism and protectionism in an increasingly interdependent world mean for the way governments are structured.
As elsewhere, Trump’s protectionism and national narcissism are sustained by the anxiety of those hit by the impersonal dark forces of the “market.”
Further raising the effective tariffs Chinese firms face is an anti-dumping regime that is often used as an instrument of protectionism, with rules that are biased against Chinese producers.
But while structural problems, from diminishing returns to capital to the rise in protectionism since the global economic crisis, are certainly acting as a drag on growth, another factor has gone largely unnoticed: the business cycle.
Issues raised by globalization’s opponents, such as labour standards in poor countries -- all those images of exploited women and children in sweat-shops -- are manipulated by rich countries as a form of protectionism by other means.
But, though many experts fear that protectionism is undermining globalization, threatening to impede global economic growth, slower growth in global trade may be inevitable, and trade liberalization is decreasingly important.
The main reason for slow progress in trade negotiations is not increasing protectionism; it is the fact that further liberalization entails complex trade-offs no longer offset by very large potential benefits.
Yet some political forces in Europe (as well as the United States) are now speaking out against international economic integration, proposing a return to the protectionism of the past.
In 1998, during the Asian financial crisis, instead of engaging in beggar-thy-neighbor devaluations and financial protectionism, countries found common ground to guard against future crises.
Like Britain and the US, France remains deeply divided between those who favor a liberal, open society and those who seek closed politics and borders, between supporters of European and global integration and proponents of nationalism and protectionism.
This is not a call for total protectionism; the AU's members should compete fiercely between themselves during this stage.
Moreover, in the past, southern African countries put their faith in protectionism and import substitution policies.
What is moderately bad news at the moment will become terrible news only if economic distress in the advanced countries – especially the US – is allowed to morph into xenophobia and all-out protectionism; if large emerging markets such as China, India, and Brazil fail to realize that they have become too important to free ride on global economic governance; and if, as a consequence, others overreact by turning their back on the world economy and pursue autarkic policies.
Their assumption is that Republicans will back free trade and oppose protectionism.
Taken to its extreme, America’s accusations risk pushing the world’s two largest economies down the slippery slope of trade frictions, protectionism, or something even worse.
If the European authorities do not move to address overcapacity in the automotive sector, we will surely see a revival of protectionism.
This gives rise to what may be called financial protectionism, which threatens to disrupt and perhaps destroy global financial markets.
In the 1930’s, trade protectionism made a bad situation worse.
In today’s global economy, the rise of financial protectionism constitutes a greater danger.
The EU’s remaining members might agree more easily on common policies regarding internal and external security and foreign policy; but, for Germany, it would become harder to champion free trade and oppose protectionism.
The paradox is that this has been good for holding the line on protectionism.
That governments did not break out into protectionism after the global financial crisis hit surprised many.
The solution was obviously to forgo protectionism and increase aggregate demand instead.
The Doha Round ought to profit from some of these fundamental forces that favor open trade and impede protectionism.
A 2009 G-20 agreement to refrain from protectionism in the aftermath of the global financial crisis helped to fend off protectionism.
BackNext