Protectionism
in sentence
619 examples of Protectionism in a sentence
Both authors emphasize the gains from trade and reject US President Donald Trump’s
protectionism.
Politicians in rich countries will be forced to strike a better balance between more liberal immigration policies and less trade
protectionism.
At a time when
protectionism
is on the rise, the risk of trade disruptions is only increasing.
Secular stagnation threatens the West, accompanied by rising
protectionism
sentiment.
Middle Eastern and North African SWFs’ reluctance to engage in the governance of their portfolio investments abroad may be a legacy of the “investment protectionism” of the Santiago Principles days.
And the effects of the Trump administration’s
protectionism
are already being felt.
But the rest of the world will hope that the result is not to give way to
protectionism
and to turn America’s back on the leadership that only it can give in tackling global problems.
Both the 1914 and the 1933 analogies point to the most striking characteristic of the current debate: the key role of security worries in justifying
protectionism.
If allowed to fester, the political consequences could be severe, including trade
protectionism
and perhaps even social unrest.
A sudden shift toward trade
protectionism
could drive up agricultural commodity prices further.
By then, and with
protectionism
rising, frothy global markets will probably have become even bumpier, owing to the serious risk of a growth stall – or even a downturn – in 2020.
Understanding in their bones the deep popularity of social causes, free trade’s enemies cleverly fuse trade
protectionism
with a defense of other social programs and values.
At precisely the moment when global cooperation is most needed, many countries are embracing nationalism, isolationism, and trade
protectionism.
Such efforts seem but a part of a surge of
protectionism
in European political debate about business, especially when it comes to cross-border acquisitions.
The Myth of Rising ProtectionismCAMBRIDGE – There was a dog that didn’t bark during the financial crisis:
protectionism.
Trade economists who complain about minor instances of
protectionism
sound like a child whining about a damaged toy in the wake of an earthquake that killed thousands.
Developing nations should argue that recognizing these economic and political realities makes the global trade regime not weaker and more susceptible to protectionism, but healthier and more sustainable.
It will not do much for good for developing countries to raise the specter of
protectionism
each time such concerns are voiced.
Developing countries should say no to obvious trade protectionism, but they should be willing to negotiate to avoid regulatory races to the bottom in such areas as labor standards or corporate taxation.
The key here is to avoid the trap of
protectionism
and international isolation.
They view the US move as a new sort of financial
protectionism
and are threatening retaliation.
Many countries have begun to look at financial
protectionism
as a way to increase their political leverage.
They can sustain relatively high growth rates in the face of weak and lengthy recoveries in the advanced countries, but not if there is a major downturn in North America or Europe (or both), a serious outbreak of protectionism, or instability in global financial markets.
The alternative is the prospect of widespread debt default, banking controls, and
protectionism
– an outcome that would set back these countries, and the global economy as a whole, for years to come.
Regardless of how Brexit or the US election plays out, it is very likely that governments in Western democracies will respond to voter angst and take measures that imply a return to some degree of
protectionism.
But all of this sensitive diplomacy could be wrecked if, in response to rising unemployment, there is an outbreak of trade
protectionism
involving America, Europe, and China.
By underscoring the need to avoid trade
protectionism
and other beggar-thy-neighbor policies, it also put some pressure on governments concerning what not to do.
Alas, both pieces of advice could breed
protectionism
if not accompanied by effective capital controls.
As Roberts points out, Trump’s move toward
protectionism
this year is at odds with his earlier policy achievements.
But a populist has now assumed the United States presidency by campaigning on a platform of stark economic nationalism and
protectionism.
Back
Next
Related words
Trade
Global
Economic
Countries
World
Would
Their
Policies
Financial
Which
Political
Growth
Crisis
Policy
Against
There
Should
Rising
Could
Nationalism