Protecting
in sentence
1024 examples of Protecting in a sentence
Safe and effective HPV vaccines have been on the market since 2006,
protecting
against HPV types 16 and 18, which cause 70% of all cervical cancer cases.
The story begins with an abortive coup on the night of September 30, 1965, when junior military officers, claiming to be
protecting
President Sukarno from a right-wing clique, captured and executed the army commander and five other high-ranking generals.
The rich were the old-money Protestant establishment whose members had lost their skills for
protecting
their wealth, which was therefore rightfully forfeited to street-savvy up-and-comers – mainly Jewish – amoral enough to help themselves to it.
Unfortunately, faced with a choice between
protecting
the long-term interests and human rights of their customers and complying with laws implemented by unelected power-holders, technology firms like Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google seem to have embraced the Ah Q spirit.
Finally, governments must implement regulations that strike a balance between
protecting
investors and consumers, and giving banks, retailers, and financial-technology and telecommunications companies room to compete and innovate.
As a result, China, which is particularly concerned to keep the US out of the negotiations, prefers to pursue bilateral talks, knowing full well that such an approach will invariably create a zero-sum game in which one side can be portrayed as
protecting
its national interest, and the other as having betrayed it.
These investments in physical and social infrastructure provide a means of
protecting
children from a range of diseases.
As for liberalization, China is committed to implementing policies to open up further its markets to trade and foreign investment, while
protecting
the legitimate rights and interests of foreign investors.
But the definition of FDI protectionism can become more complicated, because measures taken in the interest of legitimate public policy objectives – for example,
protecting
national security or increasing FDI’s contribution to the host economy – are not necessarily instances of it, even if they make the foreign-investment climate less hospitable.
Safer Climate DisastersNEW YORK – Too often, participants in the climate-change debate make an erroneous distinction between
protecting
ourselves from the longer-term impact of global warming and better preparing ourselves against today’s extreme weather events.
Though the ideal long-term response would be for the world to eliminate all greenhouse-gas emissions by the end of the century, we must confront the immediate challenges of
protecting
the planet’s most vulnerable populations.
What makes these economies function is not a policeman
protecting
every shop window, but rather people’s trust, fairness, and fellow-feeling to honor promises and obey the prevailing rules.
Protecting
the Kim dynasty’s rule has become the regime’s alpha and omega.
Reacting to Snowden’s allegations, US figures, like former CIA and NSA Director Michael Hayden, made no reference at all to America’s obligations under international law, to its interest in
protecting
diplomacy, or even to the unfairness and bad faith involved in spying on partners with whom one is supposedly negotiating in a transparent way.
While it supported the fight against piracy off the Horn of Africa, that was more a policing operation than a military one, and it was guided by a shared interest in
protecting
trade routes from the Middle East and Asia.
And, though Germany shares the UK’s belief that NATO bears primary responsibility for
protecting
Europe, its view of European engagement is even more restrictive.
There was also opposition from some feminist organizations, which accused Amnesty of
protecting
“the rights of pimps and johns.”
In the right circumstances, a virtuous cycle, whereby local producers have a direct interest in
protecting
wildlife (because they are benefiting from its legal trade) is the best – and sometimes the only – long-term solution to the problem of sustainability.
A country’s legislature is the single most important institution for
protecting
its citizenry from the excesses of the elite and the costly demands of narrow interests.
Stealth laws that claim to defend local values, religion, or the traditional family have nothing to do with
protecting
society from scary, immoral gays; they have everything to do with
protecting
scary, immoral oligarchs from society.
Norway agreed to provide $1 billion in “performance-based payments” to Brazil for successfully
protecting
its rainforests.
For those of us who believe that a forest credit market could provide critical means of
protecting
our planet our Musk moment is here.
They therefore presume that, despite American professions to the contrary, the US seeks BMD capabilities that can negate Russia’s strategic deterrent under the guise of
protecting
America and its allies from Iran.
A vast number of people can be employed if only the government stops
protecting
State enterprises by restrictions on production and internal trade.
Yet many of the governments responsible for
protecting
these sites within their borders are not only failing to take strong climate action; they are actively pursuing dirty energy projects like coal mines and coal-fired power plants.
That means
protecting
and defending Daoud (to take just one current example), a French-language writer of Muslim origin who suggested that those seeking sanctuary in Europe would do well to learn to appreciate European values.
But in the developing world, immediate economic needs often override long-term imperatives, and
protecting
a fragile environment is rarely a priority at the national level.
It would also be ineffective, because developing countries will – legitimately – refuse to assume by themselves the burden of
protecting
the world’s biodiversity to the detriment of their economic growth.
Thus, what is needed is a means to reconcile the task of helping some of the world’s poorest people with that of
protecting
irreplaceable ecosystems.
By focusing on “biodiversity hotspots” – regions with unique and highly threatened natural environments – the CEPF relies on the common-sense principle that
protecting
what nature provides for free is a crucial element of sustainable economic development.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
While
Which
Rights
People
Would
Against
Countries
About
Health
Global
Economic
Should
There
Government
Environment
Other
World
Governments
Interests