Example collocations logo

Prosperity in sentence

1948 examples of Prosperity in a sentence

In recognition of Germany’s growing significance, Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao welcomed a delegation of German business leaders to Beijing this May with the words: “Stronger Chinese-German cooperation is good for the two countries, good for China-EU relations, and good for world prosperity and stability.
First, Germany embraces the self-serving fiction that it owes nothing to others for its prosperity.
Today, Macron is prepared to establish himself as a similar leader, but he needs a reliable German partner willing to challenge ordoliberal rigor in the name of Europe-wide prosperity.
The world economy is reasonably good at achieving economic growth, but it fails to ensure that prosperity is equitably shared and environmentally sustainable.
Rather than focusing solely on income, sustainable development encourages cities, countries, and the world to focus simultaneously on three goals: economic prosperity, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability.
Economic prosperity speaks for itself.
Social inclusion means that all members of society – rich and poor, men and women, majority and minority groups – should have equal rights and equal opportunities to benefit from rising prosperity.
Ultimately, Brazilian policymakers are concerned with their own well being, not with the prosperity of foreign investors.
Then there are the Scandinavian countries, where egalitarian policies evidently have not stood in the way of economic prosperity.
China was cited as the main challenger to “American power, influence, and interests,” an adversary that is “attempting to erode American security and prosperity.”
Although North Korea has doggedly stood behind its outmoded model of state control and central planning, Kim’s visits to the boom cities of Dalian and Tianjin reflect his tentative but ongoing interest in alternative ways to achieve “strength and prosperity” for his country.
With billions of people still below the first rung of the digital ladder, the climb to prosperity is becoming more challenging than ever.
Brazil is currently benefiting from a favorable external environment, strong international credibility, and unprecedented prosperity for ever-larger segments of the population.
Meanwhile, China’s economic slowdown – the result of global weakness and efforts to cool the country’s inflation and overheated asset markets – threatens to slow the pace of job creation for the millions moving annually from rural poverty to greater prosperity in China’s expanding urban areas.
As graduation nears for the first class to complete their Master of Business Administration since the onset of the global financial crisis, students are circulating an oath that commits them to pursue their work “in an ethical manner”; “to strive to create sustainable economic, social, and environmental prosperity worldwide”; and to manage their enterprises “in good faith, guarding against decisions and behavior that advance my own narrow ambitions but harm the enterprise and the societies it serves.”
As for the ultimate objectives of the managerial profession, they are, as we have seen, nothing less than “to create sustainable economic, social, and environmental prosperity worldwide.”
The third major obstacle to global peace and prosperity is the disappearance of ethics from the functioning of states and markets.
President Pedro Pires of Cape Verde was awarded the 2011 Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership, for transforming his country into “a model of democracy, stability, and increased prosperity.”
And savings, the seed corn of future prosperity, remain in woefully short supply.
If they fail, the momentum behind regional integration – which has brought peace, prosperity, and hope to hundreds of millions of people – will weaken considerably, to the detriment of all.
Whereas many argue that France can move forward only by adopting the Anglo-American neo-liberal model, Germany’s success clearly demonstrates that the claim that only the free market can produce prosperity is bogus.
Given that both countries have almost perfectly aligned regional security interests, there should be plenty of scope for the two to act in tandem to improve regional security and mutual prosperity.
In the end, the prosperity they promised never arrives, at least not for long.
Voters surrender freedoms for that promised prosperity, as Russia under Putin illustrates.
Or should they connect the dots and frame a vision of a Europe that can compete in a global economy where resource efficiency, clean energies, and low-carbon prosperity are the ingredients of success?
An ambitious policy framework that underpins Europe’s energy security and strengthens the single market would also support Europe’s drive towards reduced CO2 emissions and low-carbon prosperity.
But, though this approach could weaken Putin’s legitimacy by limiting his ability to deliver economic prosperity, it could also result in an anti-Western nationalist backlash.
After all, from the European Union to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to the North American Free Trade Agreement, we see how geographic regions can create conditions for shared growth and prosperity by removing barriers to commerce, harmonizing regulatory norms, opening labor markets, and developing common infrastructure.
Its model should not be Palestine and permanent battle, but Switzerland and permanent prosperity.
Despite its current travails, it will discover a path to prosperity when the US does.
BackNext