Example collocations logo

Points in sentence

3133 examples of Points in a sentence

However, Schwentke and Rubin might have leveraged sharper emotional arcs at particular narrative points.
Beethovens 2nd is a pretty good sequel, not as good as the first as far structure wise, but it comes pretty close for me.Its fun, entertaining, and somewhat funny.Also it actually follows up the first one in a good way.It was very new and fresh in a way, and some what believable, that really the first one and second one capture in a right way.It was good to see the return of the original cast members, and to add in some new characters like Regina( who was a cool villain).It was really funny at times, especially at some points from Bonnie Hunt( who's character I love).I didn't care much for the ending, and some points it was a little too out there and unbelievable, and the dogs annoyed me at some points, as did some characters.Well, overall if you liked the first one you'll like this, and in fact this is probably the last good one sequel in the series.
There are just so many bad points about this movie (not to mention a laughable stab at trying to rip off Finding Nemo and Shark Tale) The animation is absolute carp, the voice-over work (by a blatantly wannabe Will Smith-like Freddie Prinze Jr and Rob Schneider) is a jumbled mess and the whole 'complexity' of the story is just bad.
Scorzese put you in a wild society that it's an unbelieveble mirror of our times, he bring us in Five points and you believe that the plot and New york's history is there but at the end we understand that we cannot see only five points in our life but even watching around to understand what's going on in all your country.
Which points out one of the flaws of the movie: _why_ do you have to speak his name five times?
I can't quite explain just how bad this is , it has absolutely no good points whatsoever .
Ugh what to say... OK well I want to start by making some points I'm a romance guy.
The Apostle had some good points, among them competent actors, good production values and convincing locations.
At no point during this incoherent rambling, did it ever make sense, everyone who watched this... is now dumber, I award it no points, and may got have mercy on the directors soul...
As Quintin Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" shows, a story can be told in severals points of view.
The match itself had some good points, like the final teaming of the Rock and Sock Connection.
My husband and I watch this and we both end up in tears (at different points) and can identify with the characters.
Frederick Knott wrote Dial as a play in the early fifties and the Hitchcock film version was released in 1954 BUT the entire plot (our old friend the 'perfect' murder) hinged on the fact that in those days only the upper and middle classes had telephones at all and those were in fixed locations and in this era of jack points and cell phones the idea of someone obliged to answer a telephone located on a desk in front of heavy drapes behind which a murderer was lurking ready to strike when the phone was answered would be ludicrous.
In once scene a bureaucrat points to a cabinet full of crimes related to marijuana & describes one where a girl butchered her entire family.
I have knocked off points for plot, repetition, and incredibility.
Among the many detracting points, the lighting is terrible (half of the film is shot on digital video .
I mean, some of the plot points are unique, and it's at least nice not to see the same assembly-line horror plot that you'd see in a bigger-budget movie.
As other people have mentioned, the movie does have many boring points.
Another thing that really made this a bad adaptation was the fact that nanny was a rookie on her craft...With this change, they managed to lose the sarcastic remarks, her sassy points of view and made it so cliché and predictable.
3 points come from the fact that usually when something is really bad, it makes it just a little funny as it is.
Things were not fully explained and they jumped back and forth between points.
Points to consider when you watch this film: photography is sublime and music selection is fantastic.It's a film for romantic people and... well for everyone really.
The remaining interest in this film lies in the historical/cultural themes: The war (referenced only in regard to minor plot points - the characters seem scarcely affected except that they're scolded for leaving their lights on after curfew), and the role of astrology in American society (it seems to be have been perceived as a way for idle, reasonably well-off women to be parted from their money).
Through many episodes with some linking points since 1808 in Toledo (Spain) to the present days in France, Bunuel presents a delicious surrealistic satire to the moral and costumes of the hypocrite society, to the family values and to the church.
The 1989 film has some good points, but, unlike the 1945, 1965, and 1974 versions, it grows less enjoyable with each viewing.
this show points out the most shallow and selfish aspects of human beings, and people find this entertaining?
As somebody who came to university in Glasgow and found outlets for my more esoteric habits I found myself nodding and laughing redolently at many points, although I should add that I was never into the fantasy role playing contained herein.
I understand the story was about a family and not the war but how can people get past the unrealistic points of the war this movie portrayed?
it doesn't get to all aspects of Dickens' original work, but it hits all the major points, and is coupled with great creative and original songs that get stuck in your head for days.
The points raised are very valid and moving, and the need to recognize and acknowledge them becomes very evident.
BackNext