Paying
in sentence
1450 examples of Paying in a sentence
“[I]f the US were getting good value from the extra…$750 billion diverted annually from
paying
people who make directly useful goods and provide directly useful services, it would be obvious in the statistics.”
If the price for France's continued willingness to act as a major promoter of European integration is a handful of nuclear tests, it is a price worth
paying.
They can no longer fill an important role in their family, community, or country, and the perception that high earners are not
paying
their fair share, while others receive benefits without working magnifies their sense of injustice.
But, as the role of manufacturing diminished in advanced economies, the brightest talents tended to gravitate to finance and other service fields that were growing rapidly – and
paying
well.
Moreover, while South Korea can afford to increase public spending today, raising expenditure without
paying
careful attention to resource allocation will eventually undermine fiscal sustainability.
Russians no longer care about slogans and symbols because
paying
bills and feeding their families doesn’t leave time for indoctrination and ideology.
In recent years, Big Tech companies have been subjected to scrutiny for perfecting a dark art pioneered by commercial newspapers, radio, and television: attracting and holding our attention, in order to sell access to our senses to
paying
advertisers.
Whereas readers, listeners, and viewers were customers
paying
for some commodity, commercial electronic media learned how to profit by transacting directly with vendors while reducing us, and our data, to a passive commodity at the heart of the transaction.
Africa is
paying
a particularly heavy price.
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras – a supposedly radical leftist who,
paying
homage to Che Guevara, named his son Ernesto – has become a Chinese patsy.
But if the price of all housing goes up, the country as a whole is no better off; after all, people have to live somewhere, so, other things being equal, cashing in on higher house prices would merely mean
paying
more for one’s next home.
Then, on December 5, the US Congress voted unanimously to adopt the Taylor Force Act, which blocks aid to the Palestinian Authority from 2018 to 2024, unless the PA stops
paying
monthly salaries and other benefits to the families of killed or convicted Palestinian militants.
In turn, Lukashenko has decided for economic reasons that his country needs EU support and can no longer depend exclusively on Russia without
paying
a heavy political price.
But American women voters know quite well what their own struggles are:
paying
the bills, educating their kids, dealing with a degenerated, costly health-care system, and so on.
If we are to avoid
paying
a high economic, strategic, and environmental price for its shortcomings, a better system of developing and enforcing internationally agreed energy rules is essential.
But, despite
paying
lip service to the market, the European left remains torn by an inner contradiction between its anti-capitalist origins and its recent conversion to free-market economics.
Many evade or reject
paying
taxes, in part by appealing for compassion towards the poor.
In Rennes, the panel debating reproductive medical issues supported the policy of not
paying
for eggs or sperm – not even by the back door of increasing the level of “expenses.”
We estimate that if European regulators had adopted this approach and forced banks to stop
paying
dividends in 2010 – the start of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe – the retained equity could have paid for more than 50% of the 2016 capital shortfalls.
Nonetheless, our findings suggest a simple first step toward preventing bank capital erosion: stop banks with capital shortfalls from
paying
dividends (including internal dividends such as employee bonuses).
So this is my hope for the New Year: we stop
paying
attention to the so-called financial wizards who got us into this mess – and who are now calling for austerity and delayed restructuring – and start using a little common sense.
If the EU refused, his implied threat was simply to stop
paying
interest and make the entire primary surplus available for extra public spending.
Moreover, the US will be
paying
for its current excesses with the promise of future payments, and inefficient stimulus now will not give future generations the productive resources needed to make good on it.
America is
paying
a high price for continuing in the opposite direction.
To save innocent people from
paying
with their lives, the world’s leaders must act quickly and boldly.
In reality, more people earning, consuming, and
paying
taxes leads to more economic growth.
If the real interest rate on Greek debt were 4% (more or less what Greece is
paying
now for the emergency loans from the European Union) and annual GDP grew by 2% on average, the required primary fiscal surplus each year for the next quarter-century would be 5.7% of GDP.
A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that
paying
500,000 soldiers the current average Russian monthly wage of $700 would cost about $5.6 billion a year (including all taxes and pension contributions).
On the other hand, the EU is
paying
a steep price for the bureaucratic anonymity of its leaders.
Europe, in particular, is
paying
a heavy price for underusing its fiscal capacity – a decision that has been driven by the political unpopularity of debt and fiscal transfers.
Back
Next
Related words
Attention
Their
Price
People
Would
Which
Other
While
About
Without
Taxes
Money
Should
Government
Countries
Could
After
There
World
Movie