Paying in sentence

1450 examples of Paying in a sentence

Paxton (Jay Hernandez), is a law school grad with no qualms about paying for whatever the market offers, which in Amsterdam covers a lot.

The two soldiers meet up with Mary Astor,(Anis bin Adham/Miraz),"Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte','64, who wears a veil over her face and charms the two soldiers into paying for her fare on their voyage.

I hope Hollwood producers are paying attention because he is the next action star, just look at him!

It is unfortunate that the soliciting of refunds from multiplexes is so impractical; my only recourse was to walk into a screen showing 'Shaloin Soccer' without paying.

I would endeavor to guess that the main actors in this movie donated their time and talents gratis, because I cannot imagine anyone paying for the services of professional actors just to let their talents languish in the doldrums of obscurity, drivel and overall bad acting.

It was painful to see Sherlock as a tourist in a wildly inappropriate DC milieu (the back-projected crazy quilt of Washington monuments on his drive around town makes it seem the chauffeur is on crack), spouting pax Americana patriotism and even paying tribute to the crime-fighting superiority of the FBI (??!!).

And by paying some attention to the personalities of its protagonists, it actually makes you care about them (Jeff Goldblum is excellent in the lead role), and adds a level of serious reflection on the very nature of human mortality to the raw shock.

I was confused reading one after another so laudatory reviews; I began thinking that I really wasn't paying attention when they aired the show.

Coming from an Italian family I feel like I know these characters so well- Matt Dillon is adorable and very believable as Gus, the guy who needs to stop paying alimony to his ex-wife Lee so he can go into a business opportunity with his friends.

Herein lies the problem--the movie in the movie is actually more interesting than the movie we are paying to see.

Hah! Bill Paxton and Oscar winner Helen Hunt went on to much greater success in 'Twister', but seem to just be paying their dues here.

This movie is truly worth paying five dollars.

The thought of people paying to see this piece of crap sends a chill down my spine...

I'm curious about who's really paying for this show.

I strongly suggest that those who love Freddie Prinze, Jr. should stare at his picture for 90 minutes rather than paying $8 to endure this torturous abomination.

I guess I'm a fan of the genre, but I can tell you I won't be paying more than 5 bucks for any of them.

Also this would discourage rappers to think that they can carry a movie without paying their dues (50 Cent, Ja Rule, DMX, Trina, Drag On etc.).

Now that I'm an adult I'm paying a fortune for bootlegs and authorized versions.

Caught by police for his actions in saving Shilo, Nathan must work for Rotti as a way of paying off his debt for saving him from prison.

Paying attention to details like this will help understand the movie as this was intentional and if you want to know how it happened, all I can say is watch the movie.

On top of that, foreign official in Georgia Pier Lewis, who constantly makes fun of the company's methods (as cutting power for a few minutes in an airport for not paying its bills, when a plane was about to land) and the Georgian people's reactions, is a rather pathetic character, making one wonder if he's ever heard the word humanism.

The kids are stuck in Lugosi's creepy house, and basically silly situation after silly situation transpires, without any logic or reasoning building up to a ridiculous conclusion that, if you were casually paying attention, you could have easily picked up from the start.

Putting it in the context of a Stephen king production it becomes even worse as he usually writes qualitative books which have generated movies worth paying time to watch, for instance the Green Mile.

And while Careful looks quite good--though the tinting is at times oversaturated--his insistence on having his cast read the script in an arch deadpan style is simply annoying and frankly an insult to the films to which he is supposedly paying tribute.

Ten years after one of Fox's most popular television show, I thought they'd have put more effort into paying tribute to the old days.

I was disappointed to waste part of my evening on this - heaven alone knows what a paying cinema audience would have made of it!

You will not walk away from this movie confused or wondering what it was all about - unless you weren't paying close attention all along.

I won't spoil the ending, because I was too confused by the uneven plot to know what happened (I also stopped paying attention mid-way through.

Seriously, the Trivia for this film says that the writers/producers/whatever had their names removed from the credits 'after' they saw the result??? What about paying attention 'during' the filming...I cannot understand how 'anyone' could have needed to wait until 'after'the filming was complete to realize that this was a turd on the face of humanity.

I'm sure it helps to assure that their film gets seen because its the look that film festival organizers seem to like, but for me a member of the paying audience I find it more on the order of lacking in creativity.

Related words