Paradigm
in sentence
388 examples of Paradigm in a sentence
The main concern in this period of great uncertainty is whether the transition to a new
paradigm
can be managed without further destabilizing the international political-economic order.
A quarter-century ago, the Brundtland report, named for former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Brundtland, called for a new
paradigm
of sustainable development.
Despite the 2015 Paris climate agreement, which changed the
paradigm
in which we talk about climate change, world leaders have remained reluctant to do what is needed to make a real difference.
Diplomacy tries to lower the temperature; the demotic
paradigm
raises it.
“Game analysis” has become the
paradigm
of political narrative.
Growth of this type requires a
paradigm
shift in economic development policy, as well as international cooperation beyond 2015.
The stability of the region and the credibility of the Western
paradigm
of markets and liberal democracy are at stake.
Traditional socialism, with its promise of the benevolent power of the state, has vanished beyond recall; and so has the infinite reassurance of the welfare state, which was supposed to protect against all adversity; and so has the
paradigm
of Keynesian demand management, with its promise of guaranteed employment and prosperity.
Demand for this alternative vision of aid has increased with the evident failure of the modernization-based development
paradigm.
The region needs a new security
paradigm.
Contrary to the traffic-flow scenario described above, optimized suggestions – which often amount to a self-fulfilling prophecy of your next purchase – might not be the best
paradigm
for online book browsing.
Data-driven optimization, conversely, derives solutions from a predetermined paradigm, which, in its current form, often excludes the transformational or counterintuitive ideas that propel humanity forward.
“There is a new
paradigm
here,” he said.
It will take some time before the full meaning of this new
paradigm
comes into focus.
The new
paradigm
dramatically changes the strategic calculus in the region.
In response, “[p]olicymakers explicitly reject the conservative
paradigm
and ignore the existence of any type of constraints on macroeconomic policy,” such that, “[i]dle capacity is seen as providing the leeway for expansion.”
National Drift or Global MasteryLONDON – As world business leaders gather in Davos, a long-overdue
paradigm
shift in monetary policy – subordinating the targeting of inflation to the targeting of growth – is slowly taking shape.
The knowledge contained in the Book of Life has catalyzed
paradigm
changes in biology and medicine.
The
paradigm
change in medicine will be similarly radical.
First, though, economic policymakers around the world will have to shake off the neoliberal paradigm, which has left them incapable of imagining alternative policy approaches.
We hope the US will change its “war on terror”
paradigm
and re-think its conception of a global armed conflict against Al Qaeda.
For the most part, center-right, democratically elected governments replaced the military dictatorships, and they exchanged the previous economic
paradigm
– import substitution, state intervention, and overregulation – for the Washington Consensus, which called for fiscal discipline, price stability, trade and financial liberalization, privatization, and deregulation.
And once again, governments in the region attributed their economic success to the reigning paradigm, which this time combined economic orthodoxy with redistributive policies.
I call this new
paradigm
“intelligent austerity.”
As a result, two kinds of
paradigm
shift are required.
This shift is fundamental to the survival of state ownership, and it requires that sovereign investors rethink their traditional governance
paradigm.
But this narrow
paradigm
has left all sides exasperated and no closer to a solution.
While this shift from the Oslo
paradigm
could inject new energy into finding a solution, it is almost certain to have a major impact on Palestinian nationalism, which is itself at an impasse, divided between those who hold firm to the tenets of the Oslo framework, and those who focus more on greater legal protections and universal freedoms.
Europeans prefer a more systematic reliance on the rule of law, and also on what has come to be known as the global public-goods
paradigm.
The global public-goods
paradigm
also implies some commensurability, if not uniformity, in the way we respond to various global collective-action challenges.
Back
Related words
Shift
Which
Change
Economic
Global
World
Would
Their
There
Development
About
International
Policy
Growth
Between
Think
Political
Current
Countries
Could