Original
in sentence
5947 examples of Original in a sentence
It was obvious that she had insecurities about her
original
anatomy showing through her feminine look.
What an embarassment...This doesnt do justice to the
original
with awful acting from everyone in this movie, Hitchcock must be spinning in his grave.
One reviewer said this film has been cut so many times, that there are few copies of the
original
1972 theatrical version out there.
The opening scenes of the film were rather
original
and so was the plot and thats what made me hire the movie out.
The exact opposite of the
original.
I know it was almost a decade and half between them but it's hard to see much of the magic in the
original
Hammer Dracula in this late entry to the Christopher Lee series.
The
original
Hammer vampire story had lots of atmosphere and a terrific story to get involved in. Lee was a great Dracula, a vibrant vampire if that possible, in the early outing but here he is nothing more than a cardboard character that mostly stands around and looks threatening.
One would think that anyone embarking upon a followup to the groundbreaking Naked Civil Servant of 30-plus years ago would at the very least try to honor the
original
with some kind of inspired vision, but no.
I'd not clever or
original
and it strikes me as being extremely pointless.
And again, Columbia Pictures decides to merely make "hash" using the
original
version with Curly and without any of the gags or jokes to boot! Toward the end of this pitiful flick when Joe gets stuck riding the bull, the studio didn't even make much of an effort to re-record the sound for if you listen carefully you can still here Curly going "Woo woo woo woo".
Also, when Moe and Larry throw the darts in order to "slow the bull down so he can get off", that's lifted right from the
original
because you can actually see Moe and Larry "magically" appear 15 years younger.
I was also wondering if in the
original
version there were American songs in the soundtrack... they seemed extremely out of place.
The original, although hated by some, was something I found to be actually really entertaining, mainly because it was before Jim Carrey started to really lose his touch, and Cameron Diaz was, well, "Smoooooookin!" 'Nuff said.
Cheerleader Massacre was supposed to be the fourth installment of the Slumber Party Massacre series; if that's what they were doing (which it is considering ONE actress from the
original
returns in a small cameo role), they have failed miserably and made, by far, the worst installment of the 'quadrilogy'.
It's predictable in the way it gets build up and progresses and just never succeeds in bringing anything
original
or shocking to the screen.
We never see how or why they go to back to Lonesome Dove...which is a dirt hole in the original...why would they ever leave Austin where they are hero's...for doing nothing during the whole movie...I was rooting for Blue Duck by the end of the movie and he was totally miscast.
But to my surprise the movie is at least two years older then the
original.
Jeez, people need to be more
original.
In fact, William Hanna and Joseph Barbera were fired by MGM and replaced by a team of Czech animators who had never even seen the
original
cartoons!
"The Bone Snatcher" starts out extremely promising, with the introduction of a new and
original
type of unseen evil as well as with the use of the sublimely isolated filming location of the African desert.
If they have such great imaginations then why not use that talent to make something
original?
The
original
Body and Soul (1947) is a masterpiece.
In spite of the presence of Rod Steiger, Joe Mantegna and Jennifer Beals there is nothing of value here and it is a shame this product bears the same title as the brilliant
original.
The reason there are sooo many more supporters of Russell's version (aside from the fact that you cant improve upon the original) is that Russell had presence, she absorbs every scene, whereas Lucille Ball might as well be a pattern on the wallpaper in Mame for all the attention she commands in the role.
Family Guy started out as something fresh, funny and more
original.
As a child of the 80's like so many of the other reviewers here I hated the
original
V and V: the Final Battle.
The two tracks of plot--hit-and-run and unreasoning love--just don't have enough to do with each other, and that they involve the same characters doesn't bind them enough to justify the departure from the
original
story line.
The
original
title always struck me as a rather overblown definition for a bunch of gun-toting saddle-tramps.
I'm a fan of the 1950's
original
and about 20 minutes into this remake I started to think this was going to be as good as the
original
but it wasn't.
Universal made several serial monster films in the 1940s, which were pale imitations of the
original.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Which
Story
There
Would
Version
About
Really
Series
Their
Great
After
First
Could
Sequel
Better
Other
Years
Characters
Movies