Organizations
in sentence
2499 examples of Organizations in a sentence
Then there are non-governmental organizations, often undemocratic in their own structures and yet more closely connected, it seems, to citizens.
Some countries would have preferred a full moratorium on the release of gene-drive organisms – a view shared by many indigenous peoples, food sovereignty activists, and African civil society
organizations.
Moreover,
organizations
seeking to release gene-drive organisms should obtain the “free, prior, and informed consent” of potentially affected communities.
As a result, political parties and social
organizations
alike attacked reform efforts.
More than 100 civil-society
organizations
from around the world have launched a campaign to urge development finance institutions and their shareholder governments to respect human rights in their projects, promote an environment for safe participation in development processes, and ensure that their investments do not put human-rights defenders at risk.
Development banks must therefore establish effective measures and protocols to empower defenders and respond to any threats or crackdowns against individuals or civil-society
organizations
defending human rights in connection with development activities.
In one southern African country, a leadership group comprising representing the ministry of health, local non-governmental organizations, as well as multi-lateral and bi-lateral aid groups, created a proposal for the Global Fund.
Militants have also attacked non-governmental organizations, particularly those located in the undeveloped tribal Northern Areas that lie beyond the writ of Pakistani law.
The Life You Can Save, like GiveWell and similar organizations, seeks to influence individual donors, encouraging them to think about where they can direct their donations to do the most good.
Organizations
need both, but leaders are more important.
This includes the encouragement of leadership at lower levels in their
organizations.
Nor should it be restricted to hierarchical bureaucratic
organizations.
For governments and international organizations, as with individuals, moral failure is easier to live with if we can pretend that it never happened.
We have the Rome Statute of International Criminal Code; we are heading for an innovative guide to best practice on how civil society
organizations
can best contribute to the work of the UN; and we now have a large coalition, far beyond NATO, combatting terrorism.
Nonetheless, Annan possessed a combination of charisma, elegance, eloquence, and self-control that was decisive in maintaining the visibility and legitimacy of the primus inter pares of international
organizations.
Attempts by political parties to thrive on nationalism, xenophobia and populism will soon be confronted with the limits set by the EU and other international
organizations.
News
organizations
argue that the policy is motivated by respect for the alleged victims.
But the same
organizations
would never report charges of, say, fraud – or, indeed, non-sexual assault – against a suspect who has been named on the basis on anonymous accusations.
Recent revelations of the Russian government’s involvement in hacking into the Democratic National Committee’s computer system – just two years after North Korea’s hack of Sony Pictures – has spurred a push in boardrooms around the world to tighten their organizations’ cyber security.
Top officials at USA Gymnastics, one of the country’s most prominent Olympic organizations, not only failed to alert police to those allegations; they hid the complaints.
But it should not be only the affected
organizations
that take action.
Even “innocent” companies and
organizations
must evaluate and upgrade their policies for protecting vulnerable people, along with their means for enforcing those policies.
The responsibility extends beyond the
organizations
themselves.
In the same vein, companies should be holding other
organizations
in their supply chains accountable.
As with unfair or illegal labor practices, businesses must refuse to sponsor, supply, or work with
organizations
that fail to protect their workers from sexual abuse.
If the established powers that first benefited from the globalization of trade are known as the G-7, the countries, regions, and
organizations
that are benefiting from migration – China, India, Kurdistan, Israel, ISIS, Turkey, and Niger – could be called the M-7.
Individuals gravitate to
organizations
that are compatible with their personal preferences.
Solutions depend on innovative collaboration among private companies, non-profit organizations, and governments.
Arguably, joining a terrorist organization hostile to the US is even worse than joining a foreign army, because terrorist
organizations
are more likely to target civilians.
Terrorist
organizations
usually have no such ties to a particular government.
Back
Next
Related words
International
Their
Governments
Other
Countries
Which
Should
People
Global
World
Government
Non-governmental
Public
Media
Support
Groups
Private
Institutions
There
Political