Example collocations logo

Option in sentence

1784 examples of Option in a sentence

Using OMF to fund increased fiscal deficits is always an available option, and, in extreme circumstances, it should be deployed.
White does not directly reject this option.
But I would still argue that different policy choices would result if the option of OMF were openly considered.
The latter option would, to use Milton Friedman’s phrase, inject additional demand directly “into the income stream,” rather than trying to stimulate the economy through the indirect levers of asset-price and portfolio-balance effects.
Despite White’s thoughtful questions and challenges, therefore, I remain convinced that there are some circumstances in which OMF would be an optimal policy, and that we should be willing to weigh the pros and cons of its application calmly in the light of evolving post-crisis circumstances, rather than to treat it as a taboo option.
Public investment financed by OMF might be an option.
Choosing the latter option would have devastating consequences.
The second option is serious, concerted structural reform.
The third option is rethinking and reworking the EU itself, from the euro to its basic institutions.
Enter the mass-production style emporia, and Western women have the seemingly delicious and liberating option of getting this summer's must-have tiny floral retro eighties print sundress – which will look appallingly frumpy by next summer – for $12.
The first, more plausible option is to strike bilateral deals.
One option would be to accept and live with a nuclear or near-nuclear Iran.
This is our only realistic option for helping people on the move and strengthening the communities they will eventually call home.
Given the debate over Greece, spending the sums necessary to pull the country out of its slump is likely to be politically pricey, but the cost – political, military, and financial – of allowing Ukraine to collapse is too high for failure to be an option.
The “hard Brexit” option that has gotten a lot of attention lately – particularly since British Prime Minister Theresa May announced her intention to focus on limiting immigration, even if it means losing access to the single market – would by itself change the way Europe functions.
But it is Europe’s only option.
With Trump in the White House, what was once viewed in the US as the “nuclear” option – officially charging China with currency manipulation and imposing high across-the-board tariffs on Chinese imports – has become a strong possibility.
The most likely possibility that comes to mind is known as the “Norway option.”
2. the second option is to enlarge NATO to all candidates in one fell swoop, including therefore the Baltic states as well as the Central European countries, along with Romania and Bulgaria.
But what happens then to the Baltics and Ukraine?4. the fourth and last option is to gear the pace of NATO enlargement to the process of growth of the European Union.
Many young Japanese - often the brightest and most entrepreneurial - demand to live in an open society, but the option they are choosing now is emigration.
Feeling the stones may seem like the safest option for China’s next president, Xi Jinping, and China’s other new leaders; in fact, it is the most dangerous.
The only safe option is a radical realignment of the Party with the general interest.
A more modest option could, in the short term, do much more for every dollar spent.
While that will undoubtedly be difficult to achieve, it is Germany’s only real option – and Europe’s real hope.
Policy wonks focus on weighing a “Canada option” (a free-trade agreement for goods) against a “Norway option” (a sort of junior membership in the single market).
The Canada option would not address any of the fundamental issues concerning trade in services – a critical omission, given that the UK is a major supplier, and their provision requires a complex regulatory framework.
And the Norway option would simply assume away the problem by requiring Britain to adopt passively any economic legislation adopted by the EU.
And in these politically tumultuous times, it is the only realistic option.
In any case, the regulatory status quo – which will condemn Arab youth to unemployment and disenfranchisement – is not an option.
BackNext