Nudity
in sentence
817 examples of Nudity in a sentence
Michelangelo soon found that thanks to the printing press, complaints about the
nudity
spread all over the place, and soon his masterpiece of human drama was labeled pornography, at which point he added two more portraits, one of the man who criticized him, a papal courtier, and the other one of himself as a dried up husk, no athlete, in the hands of a long-suffering martyr.
[Abu Ghraib Iraq Prison Abuses 2008 Military Police Guards' Photos] [The following images include
nudity
and graphic depictions of violence] (Camera shutter sounds) (Thuds) (Camera shutter) (Camera shutter) (Breathing) (Bells) (Bells end) So, pretty horrific.
Only partial nudity."
You know a director has doubts about their own horror film when a) there is some pointless
nudity
and b) the movie's so short they add some rather boring outtakes at the end credits that nobody really cares about because the movie wasn't that good!
I'm starting to think that the 5 stars it has is because of Martha Higareda 's
nudity
and all the men who cant buy a porn film and avoid seeing this ... I will call it "thing" cause call it film is an insult to the Mexican film industry.
The
nudity
in the movie went a bit far.
The acting in this movie isn't terrible but the script is pretty bad, and overall it's pretty boring and it doesn't even contain any
nudity
(like many Full Moon movies) to somewhat redeem it.
Those who watch slashers only for
nudity
will be more than satisfied.
While the plot and story are good, there is a little too much unnecessary
nudity.
The scene with the peeping tom is of movies greatest gratuitous
nudity
scenes I've ever seen (it doesn't even come close to fitting in the movie).
Typical slasher elements for hardcore slasher fans, gore, wonderfully gratuitous female nudity, no plot.
Jane Eyre with full frontal
nudity!
It's use of uncircumcised full frontal
nudity
and a wishy-washy script and direction that neither commits to a re-make of 'Maurice' nor decides it's a Neil LaBute flick, left me feeling 'Why would anyone ruin a perfectly good cast like this?'.
One thing I have to give credit for is the gratuitous
nudity.
There's even more gratuitous
nudity
than in the first.
The maestro must have rolled in his grave when this bawdy travesty of his work was released with its needless frontal
nudity
and cheap copulating and its portrayal of the naive but principalled Gilda as a horny ditz.
This is another notorious Mexican horror film: however, while the original Spanish-language version is quite tame, all sorts of gore and
nudity
were inserted for the English-dubbed variant (prepared by Jerald Intrator - who did similar duties on THE CURIOUS DR.
2) an early role by scream queen Linnea Quigley (with nudity), and legendary beauty EJ Peaker as the school secretary, who added a bit of humor and sex appeal.
A movie chock full of not-so-appetizing cleavage and
nudity
shots that make you wonder, "Does the director think this is funny?
The film is nothing else than an exposition of
nudity.
It looks like the only winning bet for Portuguese filmmakers is to include some (if not a lot) of
nudity
of the local stars, together with slang which otherwise, in the nowadays Portuguese society, is repulsed with horror.
BTW, there is no
nudity.
If you just take a look at the plot keywords for this title, you pretty much know the entire content of the film: sex, breasts, exploitation, female frontal
nudity
and women's prison!
Here we get the expected animal slaughter scenes (gutting a gator; natives eating live snakes), plus some additional
nudity
and a castration.
There is nothing here that a person above the age of 5 will believe or laugh at, yet the (very brief)
nudity
and other "plot" elements make the films unsuitable for kids.
The worst part is the whole recording, I refuse to call this a film, is just a bad excuse to picture
nudity
and extreme torture, rapes of both sexes, masturbation, sperm, pissing, cannibalism, child-murder and much much more.
Other reviews have talked about how frank this film is, especially in terms of male frontal
nudity.
"Milo" is yet another answer to a question nobody ever asked.Do we really need more slashers?I for one think we already have more than enough.I guess the professional tall guys overcharged so in this one we deal with a murderous kid that's also a zombie or a ghost when he feels like it.A long time ago,he drowned but that didn't bother him and he still kills people("Friday the 13th",what's that?).One day,his survivors have a big reunion and as a surprise twist,Milo comes to pay them a visit.Through some really bad shots that show everything except the murders the cast is thinned out till only the final girl is left to find out Milo's dull,I mean dark secret.She and her friends have been dying to know.Once discovered,Milo goes on yet another murderous rampage(isn't it his bedtime yet?) and the girl,well she screams a lot.The acting is not even bottom of the barrel,the barrel refuses to be associated with it.Milo can be one creepy bastard from time to time I give him that,but some movies just can't be saved without a great script or gratuitous
nudity.
Any movie that has drug use and gratuitous
nudity
as its highlights is not worthy of praise.
No suspense, no scares, and plenty of embarrassing performances give this turkey a 3 for
nudity.
Next
Related words
There
Movie
Violence
Gratuitous
Scenes
Which
Female
Would
Story
About
Plenty
Films
Thing
Little
Really
Other
Frontal
Horror
Could
Acting