Example collocations logo

Nations in sentence

1514 examples of Nations in a sentence

Then on October 1st at a National Day speech in the Great Hall of the People Premier Li Peng defiantly proclaimed that "After shaking off imperialist bullying and persecution from various powerful nations, the long suffering Chinese people have been on the rise ever since."
Families and nations that obeyed together stayed together.
Preparing for the Green ExitPARIS – Underpinning European integration is the belief that unity between nations should bring shared prosperity instead of social, political, and economic turmoil.
The next brings word about the impact on nations and peoples least able to cope with these blows – the poorest of the world’s poor.
While the G-20 nations whose leaders met in Washington account for nearly 80% of world production, trade and investment, more than 170 other countries, representing one-third of the world’s people, were not there.
I therefore urge all nations, rich and poor, to send their highest-level representatives to Doha with full determination to do what must be done.
We have one year until they meet in Copenhagen – one year to reach an agreement that all nations can embrace.
History is what gives nations their character, their institutions, their identity.
Now, however, as rich countries struggle under the combined weight of high debt, low growth, unemployment, and inequality, they will apply greater pressure on developing nations to abide by World Trade Organization rules, which narrow the space for industrial subsidies.
The right of nations to self-determination does not imply the right of rulers to dispose of their people.
In reality, Chinese trade within Asia – for example, with the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) – is carried out largely by firms with parent companies from advanced economies, including Japan.
At the same time as Rato pushed reluctant European nations to yield some of their power in the Fund, he introduced reforms that clarified and strengthened the Fund’s role in managing exchange rates.
Meanwhile, international oversight was too weak, with the League of Nations remaining largely silent in the face of dangerous developments, such as Adolf Hitler’s remilitarization of the Rhineland.
It has been a victim of its own grandiose dreams about its role in the world and place among Islamic nations, and often of intense emotionalism and an absence of calm, dispassionate logic.
But globalization means that nations and peoples can exert an asymmetric influence.
Thanks to globalization, however, dominant nations have a variety of new tools with which to influence other countries short of war.
In 1998, during the Asian crisis, the rescue package offered by several industrialized nations - prominently Japan and the US - required Korea to lift bans on imports of certain Japanese products and to open up its banking sector to foreign banks (which is what America wanted).
People in vulnerable nations have very little say in the imposition of these policies.
Utopian schemes such as a global government or a global bank answerable to all nations are a distant dream.
First, there is the open channel, which gives a larger share of votes to the nations contributing more to organizations such as the IMF and the World Bank.
Powerful nations, by virtue of contributing senior personnel and money, gain greater access.
While it does subscribe to the principle of one-country one-vote, it is widely perceived as a preserve of rich nations.
The form that these standards take - and the increasing talk of using trade sanctions to impose them - is close to what protectionist lobbies in industrial nations seek.
The fact that questioning the practices of rich nations (who contribute more funds) exercising more voting power in these organizations sounds outrageous, shows how far away we remain from global democracy.
Now it is time to provide more equal voting power to nations irrespective of their wealth, because one of the basic tenets of democracy is that the advantages of wealth should not be compounded by giving the rich extra voting power.
The International Labor Organization reports that unions are in retreat in most nations.
“External forces,” Singh declared in Parliament, are trying to prevent India from taking “its true place” in the comity of nations.
President Barack Obama’s 2010 National Security Strategy nurtures broad policy aspirations – “[n]ow we must position the United States to champion mutual interests among nations and peoples” – but falls short as a practical guide.
“Today, many nations,” he warned, “are revising their moral values and ethical norms, eroding ethnic traditions and differences between peoples and cultures.”
From the Association of Southeast Asian Nations – now with roughly 600 million people and looking to get a single market underway – to the African Union and South America’s MERCOSUR and UNASUR, countries everywhere are coming together in regional blocs.
BackNext