Example collocations logo

Nations in sentence

1514 examples of Nations in a sentence

But Western nations are in a weak position to make this response, because they inflict so much unnecessary suffering on animals.
In the past, these were the concerns of individual nations; now they have grown to international stature.
The administration took a tougher line when Clinton addressed the South China Sea question at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations meeting in Hanoi in July 2010.
In his victory speech, he promised that his administration would “deal fairly with everyone, with everyone – all people and all other nations.”
Third, more than 140 nations agreed in Doha, Qatar to launch a new round of trade negotiations.
After years of global protests about free trade, the world's nations chose trade over protectionism.
In the Scramble scenario, nations rush to secure energy resources for themselves, fearing that energy security is a zero-sum game, with clear winners and losers.
He advocated a defense designed "to protect all 50 states and our friends and allies and deployed forces overseas from missile attacks by rogue nations or accidental launches."
Asia’s Leadership GapSINGAPORE – This week, ten foreign ministers from the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) are meeting in Hanoi.
Low-unemployment nations include low-tax Britain and the US, but also very high-tax Denmark and Sweden.
But this argument is specious: one can have a vigorous transportation industry, with trucks, rail, and air cargo moving agricultural produce within and across nations, as countries such as pre-Peronist Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, and modern Chile have done very successfully.
It is important to note that since 2001, the US has probably done more things, with more nations, in more constructive ways, and in more parts of the world, than at any other time in its history.
In the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush helped fashion and lead the largest coalition in history – 80-plus nations – to fight the global war on terror.
Furthermore, roughly 60 nations are currently cooperating in the Proliferation Security Initiative to prevent dangerous weapons and materials from being transported to terrorists or outlaw regimes.
Today, nations that were members of the Soviet Union’s Warsaw Pact, as well as some of the former Soviet Republics – countries that we used to call “captive nations” – are valued members of NATO and represent some of our most stalwart allies in the War on Terror.
Conversely, Bhutan is among the top 20 most peaceful nations, but does not even make it onto innovation indices.
After all, from the European Union to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to the North American Free Trade Agreement, we see how geographic regions can create conditions for shared growth and prosperity by removing barriers to commerce, harmonizing regulatory norms, opening labor markets, and developing common infrastructure.
The bad news is that, even under such auspicious conditions, the US, as a world power, will not relinquish its “free-hand” policy or forget its strength and its claim to preeminence among nations.
The US took the lead in building a system of international law, creating the UN, and fostering free trade and open markets around the world, while maintaining the security umbrella that allowed transnational institutions like the European Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to develop.
They have just elected a new president of the Union of South American Nations (Unasur), whose headquarters are being built in Quito, Equador.
These are not mineral-rich or bountiful agricultural nations: some coffee and bananas here, a little sugar and beef there, but nothing with which to sustain a boom.
Globalization and open societies, even if imperfect and in need of improvement, benefit nations not only in purely economic terms, but in social, political and cultural ones as well.
In the Doha trade negotiations, industrialized nations accepted the need to liberalize their agricultural markets by reducing subsidies to domestic producers and tariff barriers on agricultural imports.
All parties to the Kyoto Protocol, including African nations, have a unique opportunity to influence the post-2012 debate and defend the inclusion of land-use projects in the emerging carbon market.
Health problems will be negligible for all but a few nations.
And global warming’s impact would reduce energy consumption for almost all nations.
The important effects are on agriculture and tourism, where nations will lose, on average, about 0.5% of GDP from each sector.
One could trace its beginnings to the 1970’s, when recycled petrodollars fueled large capital inflows to developing nations.
Developing nations, the argument went, have plenty of investment opportunities, but are short of savings.
In addition, financial globalization would allow poor nations to smooth out the boom-and-bust cycles associated with temporary terms-of-trade shocks and other bouts of bad luck.
BackNext