Migration
in sentence
1241 examples of Migration in a sentence
The reason for growing international cooperation is simple: countries everywhere are affected by migration, and, increasingly, they are experiencing immigration and emigration simultaneously.
Foreign goods are subject to national safety and product-information standards; capital flows are managed by controls on bank lending; and
migration
is limited by an array of checks and conditions.
That means redistributing some of the economic benefits of free movement to communities bearing the burden of it; strengthening control of external borders and cooperation against terrorism; ensuring greater flexibility for eurozone integration and migration; and returning to the idea that EU institutions’ highest calling is to defend Europe’s nation-states, not to develop their own power.
Trump’s proposal to bar Muslims from entering the US and his demands that Mexico pay for a wall to stop
migration
would be unlikely to pass constitutional or political muster were he elected President.
In the face of a large-scale
migration
crisis, conflict on Europe’s borders, and the brutality of the Islamic State – security threats that affect all Europeans, and that cannot be confronted by any country alone – the need for a common EU foreign and security policy is clearer than ever.
Developing protected areas and corridors for shark
migration
is also important.
But the recent surge in
migration
to Europe, driven largely by Syria’s intensifying civil war, has brought Schengen’s shortcomings to the fore.
This is all the more true in view of the fact that the
migration
of decisions to an ill-defined global space is being accompanied by a widespread demand for more direct forms of democracy that can bring decisions closer to people, regions, and local communities.
EU leaders therefore must – and probably will – take this opportunity to revitalize efforts to address security, migration, and growth challenges.
A swing back to the center in continental Europe would strongly suggest that the unexpected victories for populist and anti-globalization movements in the US and Britain were not primarily a response to unemployment and disappointing economic performance since the financial crisis, mass migration, or the threat of Islamist terrorism.
Such cooperation is essential to combat terrorism, human trafficking, and
migration.
In unelectrified areas that are vulnerable to climate change, natural disasters, and economic migration, mini-grids are often the only option.
Internal
migration
is the main driver of income convergence, helped by a common language and all the other factors that foster mobility in America, such as comparatively easy access to housing and education.
Despite populist speeches about the threat posed by “Polish plumbers,” net
migration
flows between regions are generally insensitive to differences in unemployment rates among regions.
They fuel cross-border organised crime, trafficking in human beings and illicit migration, as well as the drugs trade, religious extremism and terrorism.
This constitutes strong evidence that reality-based debate and policymaking can fundamentally transform the negative political dynamics generated by
migration.
It also suggests that, by failing to engage voters on the reality of migration, mainstream politicians in Europe are manufacturing support for extremist parties.
The Transatlantic Trends survey also shows that the American public is not worried about legal migration, while around two-thirds believe that the children of immigrants are being well integrated into their communities.
These findings should embolden policymakers to be more proactive in designing pathways for legal
migration
and policies to integrate migrants.
A deliberative approach to engaging the public on other aspects of
migration
also could help quell anti-migrant sentiment.
Of course,
migration
creates real challenges for communities and can lead to job losses and lower wages for native workers.
This is one reason why labor unions, which once opposed immigration across the board, are now far more supportive of measures that would legalize undocumented workers and create more pathways for
migration.
Opposing
migration
contradicts their ideals, while supporting it means electoral defeat.
In others, they concern armed factions (Colombia and Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador), the environment (Argentina and Uruguay, Colombia and Ecuador),
migration
(Mexico and Guatemala), human rights (Haiti and the Dominican Republic), and energy (Brazil and Bolivia, Brazil and Paraguay, Argentina and Chile).
But the link between food scarcity and
migration
is stronger than it might seem to those who are not among the hungry.
Moreover, human-driven climate change threatens to intensify existing pressures affecting food supply and
migration.
In a report published last December, the European Commission’s European Political Strategy Center predicted that ever-more frequent droughts and floods will “dwarf all other drivers of migration,” with as many as one billion people displaced globally by 2050.
Getting
Migration
Governance RightDHAKA – At last year’s United Nations General Assembly summit, world leaders promised to cooperate on ensuring safe, orderly, regular, and responsible
migration.
But these benefits are easily squandered if, as we’ve seen recently with crises in the Mediterranean Sea, the Andaman Sea, the Central American corridor, the Sahel, and the Horn of Africa,
migration
is not governed responsibly and cooperatively.
World leaders can rectify this at this month’s General Assembly meeting – and specifically at today’s unprecedented summit on
migration
and refugees.
Back
Next
Related words
Countries
Crisis
Economic
Their
People
Global
About
Would
Which
Trade
Other
Climate
Change
Policies
International
Flows
Should
Migrants
Social
Could