Example collocations logo

Liberties in sentence

295 examples of Liberties in a sentence

The film could be a great inspiration for women, particularly those in the subcontinent, to search for their liberties and to attain control of their lives.
Liberties were also taken with the setting.
This adaptation of the book Nemesis is a huge improvement, it not only respects the book, despite a few liberties, but it pretty much rectifies the problems the ITV version had.
The liberties taken by the script often deepen the meaning and do seldom distort it.
One can debate some artistic liberties taken by director and scriptwriter.
Great liberties are taken with facts here, and we are presented with a Custer that is much more sympathetic to the plight of the redman than history relates.
They took a lot of liberties in rearranging events, excluding people, and using sets that do not meet the facts of their lives in the 30's.
Liberties are taken regarding the legal system in committing French Citizens against their will and the apparent ease of absconding with drugs in French Hospitals.
Creative liberties are all well and good, but when it completely changes the character, then it is too far.
My complaint is not that they've taken liberties with the facts; if the story were good, that would perfectly fine.
This may have been based on historical events, and we know that the makers of this TV docu-drama took liberties to make it more dramatic - I can live with that - but it was just so badly done!
Sadly, this version of the book takes several liberties with the story and was incredibly disappointing in my opinion.
It is a warning of how tenuous our political liberties are in an era of an over-zealous, and over-powerful federal government.
Of course, Hollywood took their customary liberties with the life story of Caruso.
will enjoy this movie as well as kids.it is based upon a true story,though i'm sure the filmmakers took some liberties in telling the story.Quaid is sensational as the title character,very convincing.if
The only person unhappy about the situation was Edgar Rice Burroughs, who, while he'd agreed to MGM's creative liberties, and enjoyed his hefty royalty checks, felt the 'dumbed down' version of his character (with no plans to allow him to 'grow') was unfaithful to his vision (he would start a production company, and soon be making his own 'Tarzan' films).
"Just Cause", while not a horrible film, takes too many liberties with the original material that Jeb Stuart didn't quite succeed in his treatment.
Insisting that Martin Luther King's inspirational spirit resides not just in American civil liberties but inside the hearts and minds of people everywhere, Danish helmer Niels Arden Oplev transplants this belief to a 1969 Danish middle school.
Tell an "authenticity Nazi" about the liberties that Boorman takes with the historic details, and they will roundly criticize it.
He isn't helped any by a screenplay that manages to ape the original while making absurd "updates" and taking liberties that cleanly toss out such things as believability and common sense.
With two of the principals dead and the other in jail, I don't understand why the film makers skipped and/or took liberties with key details, and didn't delve headfirst into the sleaze fest that was the real story.
Historical novels often take liberties with history; its expected.
And screenplays often take liberties with novels; also expected.
Hailing from Ireland, it takes plenty of liberties in its character's settings and mannerisms.
Not only is it historically inaccurate, it takes massive liberties with the character of Oliver Cromwell.
This film, while it does take great liberties with Doyle's writings, is highly entertaining.
The script was obviously written by a non-believer with the idea that the Bible can't be trusted anyway, so why not take liberties like so many other American adaptations?
In fact besides the very very basic plot (Jingle and Jangle go to find Christmas Spirit) this movie takes true liberties with what it is given.
Although I have not yet read the account on which it is based, I have no reason to believe the film takes too many liberties with the truth.
Although meaningless liberties have been taken with this true story - what possible difference, for example, could it have made to acknowledge that Mitchell was married rather than imply bachelor status - it still grips in an understated way.
BackNext