Example collocations logo

Leaders in sentence

10987 examples of Leaders in a sentence

The occasion will likely be the largest gathering of world leaders in history, as some 170 heads of state and government adopt shared goals that will guide global development efforts until 2030.
In my book European Spring, I argue that a flawed, technocratic EU needs bold leaders, political entrepreneurs, grassroots movements, and more experiments with deliberative democracy to deliver change.
The absence of well-articulated common analyses and policy coordination has accentuated legitimacy deficits, encouraging leaders and publics to opt for partial narratives and eroding confidence in existing institutional structures.
European leaders recognize the JCPOA’s importance.
True, G-20 leaders promised that they had learned the lessons of the Great Depression.
Like his fellow Catalan separatists, Puigdemont knows that the movement’s only chance of moving forward lies in internationalization.Since the Catalan regional government held an illegal referendum on independence on October 1, its separatist leaders and their sympathizers have called repeatedly for international mediation in their standoff with the Spanish government.
The Catalan separatist leaders are smart and media-savvy.
They know that scenes of violence, or even a prolonged stalemate, would weaken European leaders’ resolve not to get involved.
European leaders must not succumb to this temptation.
Facilitating the erosion of the rule of law and democracy should be anathema to its leaders.
On April 2, 2009, world leaders will head to London again to find a solution to a financial and economic crisis as dire as that of 1929.
In meetings with judges, academics, journalists and civil leaders, the top brass pointed out that Turkish law calls on the army to protect the "secular state."
Leaders such as Mashal, who has expressed a readiness to forsake alliances with Syria and Iran and to accept a two-state solution with Israel, should be bolstered rather than boycotted.
There, world leaders actually signed a legally binding deal to cut carbon emissions – something that will elude the Copenhagen summit-goers.
Meanwhile, as Gates was berating the NATO allies, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was bluntly warning African leaders that “authoritarian governments” ruled by “aging despots” were “no longer acceptable.”
Are American and European leaders being cast in a Russian remake of the 1938 Sudeten crisis?
There are also striking similarities between Western leaders’ responses to the two crises – namely, their reluctance to take decisive action.
First, any dialogue with Putin will be fruitless, unless Western leaders take a decisive approach that is shaped by concrete objectives, not bogus “strategic partnerships.”
Finally, Western leaders must recognize that appeasement cannot ensure peace and stability in Europe – not even under the fig leaf of “engagement.”
And in Thailand, market mechanisms, backed by ambitious targets, are helping the country produce businesses that are regional leaders in waste recycling, including operations now in Laos and Malaysia, while generating thousands of jobs.
Its leaders should re-affirm their commitment to embed sustainability in the global economic recovery, and their recognition of the Green Economy’s power to create a fundamentally different development path for all countries.
South Korea’s leaders must implement stronger regulations to prevent illegal transactions and unfair practices, including collusion between chaebols and government officials.
Kremlin leaders instinctively understood the benefits of normalising relations with the Holy See for Soviet propaganda and foreign policy, and meetings between the Pope and Andrei Gromyko and Nikolai Podgorny did take place.
Opportunities for a meeting between the two church leaders still exist, of course.
But Europe is too weak and too divided to be effective globally, with its leaders unwilling to pursue a common policy based on their countries’ own strategic interests.
But even more worrisome than the US administration’s doubts is the wavering confidence of many EU leaders.
In every case, voters said, “no” – outcomes that can be blamed, particularly in the UK, on national leaders’ habit of blaming the EU for domestic problems.
Indeed, European leaders’ parochialism is a major reason why the EU is failing to retain broad-based public support.
Though the systemic risks brought about by globalization cannot be eliminated, they can be mitigated, if world leaders work together and learn from past mistakes.
It is time for our leaders to recognize new systemic risks and work together to mitigate them.
BackNext