Example collocations logo

Leaders in sentence

10987 examples of Leaders in a sentence

It is framing these investments within the narrative of its Belt and Road Initiative, a global vision for connectivity, cooperation, and prosperity that resonates powerfully with Latin American leaders.
The tide of events shifted to favor the opposition and facilitate coordination among its disparate parts, including politicians, business leaders, civil society organizations, active and retired military officials, intellectuals, labor unions and even members of religious groups.
Smelling blood, business and labor leaders called for a national strike to support the company.
He thus validated the condemnation of Latin American leaders and lost vital military and political support even before he swore himself in.
The Value of European ValuesEurope's leaders have revived the constitutional talks that broke down last December in a dispute about voting rights.
Indeed, whether or not its leaders acknowledge it, the European Union is now in direct conflict with Russia over its enlargement policy since the end of the Cold War.
Leaders must start living up to the responsibilities that come with sharing a single currency.
Military leaders expressed satisfaction at how the situation was handled.
And the rapid economic growth that China’s leaders must sustain in order to lift enormous numbers of people out of poverty – and thus prevent a crisis of legitimacy – places a floor under global food, energy, and mineral prices.
The public and the media could use the oath as a tool for assessing – and holding accountable – would-be leaders.
It has not shrunk from bombarding Abbas’s presidential compound, attacking Fatah’s command centers, and targeting Fatah military leaders like Rashid Abu Shbak, the commander of Fatah’s internal security and many others, all of them lieutenants of the supreme Fatah military authority in the Gaza strip, Mohamed Dahlan.
Three times in their history – in 1937,1947, and 2000 – the Palestinians were offered a state, and three times their leaders failed to meet the challenge – admittedly never an easy one for a nation built on such an unwavering ethos of dispossession.
Yet, engaged in a war driven by fury and vengeance, the Israelis are now focused again on a manhunt for gang chieftains, targeted killings of Hamas squads, and the arrest of its political leaders, not on peace overtures.
As we look forward, our goal is to educate tomorrow’s leaders to build on the equitable health-care system that we have created.
He worried about losing the trust of world leaders he had brought along and the loss of life that would likely result.
Neither Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who visited Israel a few weeks after his reelection in December 2014, nor the leaders of China, now Israel’s third-largest trading partner, bother to link their economic ties with Israel to the success of peace talks with the Palestinians.
As world leaders gather this week for the Oslo Summit on Education for Development, the lessons from this experience could not be more relevant.
Third, world leaders must get serious about inequality.
As world leaders gather in Oslo, millions of parents will be struggling to ensure that their children receive the education they deserve – one that will enable them to build better lives for themselves and their families.
To what extent should political leaders see their role narrowly, in terms of promoting the interests of their citizens, and to what extent should they be concerned with the welfare of people everywhere?
But the question is not only one for those who aspire to be world leaders.
The leaders of smaller nations must also consider, in contexts like global warming, trade pacts, foreign aid and the treatment of refugees, to what extent they are prepared to consider the interests of "outsiders”.
As Ash suggests, there is a strong ethical case for saying that it is wrong for leaders to give absolute priority to the interests of their own citizens.
Other countries have their leaders, who have similar roles in respect to the interests of their fellow-citizens.
So long as that situation prevails, we must have nation-states and the leaders of those nation-states must give preference to the interests of their citizens.
But as long as that remains a lofty idea without political substance, our leaders will feel that they must give some degree of priority to the interests of their own citizens.
Political leaders enjoy fewer degrees of freedom before they must respond to events, and must then communicate not only with other governments, but with civil society as well.
Both questions reveal how much we still live in the shadow of the Nuremberg Tribunal, where the Nazi leaders were tried by an international judicial panel.
It was believed, perhaps correctly, that the Germans would be incapable of trying their own former leaders.
To break the impasse, one or two bold and far-sighted leaders need to remind their citizens of their countries’ legal and, perhaps more important, moral duties to the refugees.
BackNext