Journalists
in sentence
1139 examples of Journalists in a sentence
also repeatedly asked for assurances – at least five times – that the NDAA would not sweep up people like the plaintiffs:
journalists
engaged in journalism and citizens engaged in peaceful protest.
It is not just American reporting that suffers when a law such as the NDAA threatens
journalists
and editors.
We condemn governments that silence, imprison, and even kill writers and
journalists.
Following WikiLeaks’ release in July of tens of thousands of documents on the Afghan war, a Taliban spokesman told British
journalists
that the group was “studying the report” with a view to identifying and punishing anyone found to have collaborated with US forces.
Eventually,
journalists
picked up on these trends, too, and it would now be hard to find anyone who has not heard of the “1%” – shorthand for those at the top of the global wealth and income scales.
By day three, we will see
journalists
imprisoned and media shut down; day four, bloody reprisals against protesters by secret police; day five, arrests of key opposition figures.
When a would-be dictator – anywhere, any time, on the right or the left – wants to close an open society or initiate a crackdown against a democracy movement, he follows ten classic steps: invoke a threat, create secret prisons, develop a paramilitary force, establish a surveillance apparatus, arbitrarily detain citizens, infiltrate citizen groups, target key individuals, go after journalists, call criticism “treason,” and subvert the rule of law.
That will be welcome news to people living under dictatorial regimes installed and propped up by the US, and to the opposition leaders and
journalists
languishing in US-supported prisons in those countries for having engaged in just such protest.
That is almost double the number of
journalists
killed that year.
Should
journalists
and bloggers be exposed for reporting or recirculating falsehoods or rumors?
To be sure, this will take courage, imagination, and dynamism – particularly on the part of
journalists.
Pakistani reactions were a curious mixture, ranging from dismissive declarations (backed by orchestrated bus tours of
journalists
to selected parts of the LoC) that no surgical strikes had even occurred, to angry statements declaring that irresponsible Indian firing across the LoC had killed two Pakistani soldiers.
Those targeted include cartoonists, journalists, and even children.
All the rest – scandals large and small, marijuana smoke, and errors of grammar – divert
journalists
but influence the results little.
But Trump’s challenge to the media status quo may not be an entirely bad thing:
journalists
now have an opportunity to root out the bad habits associated with cozying up to those in power.
In the lead-up to the invasion, George W. Bush’s administration assiduously courted
journalists
at mainstream liberal and conservative news outlets, who then helped it win public support by disseminating what turned out to be false claims about weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
For
journalists
and historians, it is “but he was only a one-term president.”
Obasanjo’s spokesmen regularly brief
journalists
anonymously that he favors a successor from the Niger delta area.
Credit is owed to the
journalists
who compelled the Elysée Palace to end two and a half months of culpable silence and cut ties with Benalla.
Elmer was quickly convicted of violating Switzerland’s bank-secrecy law, but few
journalists
have demanded that Assange be prosecuted for his role in the affair.
There, in the midst of the debate over WikiLeaks’ ongoing release of classified US State Department cables, and as the government threatens Assange with extradition and prosecution, respected
journalists
are running for cover.
Most American
journalists
fully understand that Assange did not illegally obtain classified material; the criminally liable party is whoever released the material to the site.
Moreover, American
journalists
know perfectly well that they, too, traffic in classified material constantly – indeed, many prominent US reporters have built lucrative careers doing exactly what Assange is doing.
Any dinner party in media circles in New York or Washington features
journalists
jauntily showing prospective employers their goods, or trading favors with each other, by disclosing classified information.
That is what serious
journalists
do, after all: their job is to find out what government officials do not want revealed.
American
journalists
also know that the government classifies information mostly to spare it embarrassment, or for expediency, rather than because it has genuine national-security concerns.
So, again: why have US
journalists
and editors turned Assange into a pariah?
One is to intimidate journalists, say, by accusing a high-profile reporter of “treason” or endangering national security through his reporting, and then threatening him with torture, a show trial, or indefinite detention.
There is another sense in which, from the perspective of establishment US journalists, Assange is “not one of us.”
These journalists’ self-interested prejudice against a medium in which they are not the gatekeepers prevents them from conceding that Assange is a publisher, rather than some sort of hybrid terrorist blogger.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Media
Government
People
Against
About
Public
Which
Other
Politicians
Country
Countries
World
Press
Political
There
Should
Would
Freedom
Including