Example collocations logo

Journalists in sentence

1139 examples of Journalists in a sentence

Now, with crackdowns on foreign and domestic journalists, Prime Minister Thaksin's government seems to be retreating into Thailand's history of authoritarian rule.
Keeping things quiet may be one reason animating the recent campaign to dampen the enthusiasm of Thailand's usually buoyant journalists.
He bought Thailand's only independent TV station and sacked 23 journalists for being too independent.
The Hazards Behind the HeadlinesLONDON – Not too long ago, the only journalists working in conflict areas who might be afforded protection were those working for wealthy, predominantly Western news organizations.
These journalists would attend expensive courses run by former special forces personnel, who trained them to navigate hostile environments.
But journalists elsewhere have rarely benefited from this culture of safety.
From Mexico and Brazil to Pakistan and Somalia, journalists are often murdered with impunity.
For the last 15 years, the International News Safety Institute has been collating a list of journalists who have died on the job.
In places where corrupt regimes or militant groups want to control the flow of information, journalists have long had to risk being kidnapped or killed.
Wherever journalists work – whether online or offline – they need to be mindful of more physical, psychological, and digital risks than ever before.
Organizations – including the BBC, the Dutch public service broadcaster NOS, and others across Europe – have plans in place for journalists responding to incidents in their home cities or those directly targeting their newsrooms.
Beyond bullets and bombs, journalists also face increasing psychological threats at home.
In the US, journalists face another kind of psychological threat: harassment from their own government.
Although journalists are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, US President Donald Trump has nevertheless used his social-media bully pulpit to routinely vilify the entire news media.
Trump’s disdain for free speech mirrors that of authoritarian governments, from Turkey to the Philippines, where journalists have been arrested, imprisoned, and harassed in record numbers.
Journalists are also increasingly vulnerable online, where anonymity has created a culture of trolling and harassment.
Female journalists have had to bear the brunt of digital attacks, which can rapidly escalate into threats of sexual violence.
In response, many journalists have abandoned social media, and others have left the profession of journalism altogether.
The world is a risky place for journalists, which is precisely why we must do everything that we can to protect them.
Angry people swayed by the populist message are angrier at liberal professors, clever bankers, or skeptical journalists than they are at multi-billionaires.
Even Israel, which, despite its many obvious problems, has always had a robust democracy, is moving in this direction, with government ministers demanding proof of “state loyalty” from writers, artists, and journalists.
Journalists who claim otherwise are not a representative sample, even in Western countries.
Yes, Castro jailed 75 independent journalists and others in an April sweep - that is the monster in him.
Sanctions imposed on journalists, lawyers, and others who cross an invisible line often involve punitive legal action, though in many cases the authorities dispense with formalities to ensure their line is toed.
Indeed, the government’s suspicion of the international media is liable to spark friction when thousands of journalists arrive and inevitably widen their coverage beyond athletics to politics and human rights.
According to Bob Woodward, the doyen of Washington journalists, the modus operandi of US President Donald Trump’s administration is “maximize aggression to conceal vital weaknesses.”
But more responsibility arguably lies with the American broadcast journalists who amplified his schoolyard name-calling and bizarre policy views.
They must rely on their messages being passed through several hands, including broadcasters and personal finance journalists, before they reach the high street.
Even worse, on at least one key point, the very language used among policymakers and leading journalists to describe finance is badly broken.
Journalists who ignore the guidance on terminology in this speech should be called – in private – by the Fed.
BackNext